[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRMIC-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_122623
]
Benjamin Bentmann commented on MRMIC-8:
---------------------------------------
You might also consider naming the mojo just {{rmic}} such that its standalone
invocation would look like {{rmic:rmic}}. Such a naming would especially be
required to support its execution by the simple command {{rmic}} as wished by a
user in the [MPLUGIN-40 Discussion at
dev@|http://www.nabble.com/-Discuss--MPLUGIN-40-to15259635s177.html]. I don't
want to vote for any approach but just wanted to give a further perspective.
> Rename process-classes mojo to rmi-compile
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MRMIC-8
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRMIC-8
> Project: Maven 2.x RMIC Plugin
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Paul Gier
> Fix For: 1.0-alpha-1
>
>
> Process-classes seems like a very generic name for the main mojo, and it is a
> little confusing since the default phase is also called process-classes.
> Should this be renamed to something like rmi-compile?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
