I'd say we remove that link until the site follows the documentation
standard.
I agree that its site is not that pretty but inspired by the recent question
on user@ I wondered why we had no link at all although the plugin is
released. Isn't a poor site better than no site? I mean, the user gets at
least some basic infos about the existing plugin parameters without going
down to the sources.
Besides, what about the other plugins whose site does not follow the
documentation standard, like jboss-maven-plugin or
idlj-maven-plugin to name just a few? Should we remove these ones, too?
What do you think?
Benjamin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
