Yup :-) Hope you can fix it... and then I'd be happy to consume the
mojo plugin again :-) Feel free to steal whatever code you can from
my impl, though its groovy, you should still be able to figure out
what its doing with relative ease ;-) And if not ping me.
--jason
On Jun 12, 2008, at 3:25 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Jason Dillon wrote:
plugin at the time (and still) does not know to omit classes which
already exist in the src/main/java tree for overridden nodes.
The FAQ suggest placing those classes next to the grammar, but IMO
this is not really desirable, since they should, IMO, live in the
src/main/java tree like normal classes.
Never thought about that, but I agree, the plugin is partly breaking
with the usual Maven way of organizing project files. Thanks for the
feedback!
Benjamin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
