David Holroyd schrieb:
I am ok with this personally, as I'd hope that the plugin has a better
chance of be kept up to date with advances in the core tool by having
the code colocated.
+1, I agree with your reasoning.
Should I start a vote on this
Might be advisable to get this a little more "formally" and save you
from any complaints. In the past, there were similar votes for the Shade
Plugin [0] and the Cobertura Plugin [1].
I guess in the end, it's just a question what to do with the sources
here at Mojo. AFAIK, the source right now being ASL-2 licensed doesn't
prohibit the ANTLR folks from creating their own branch. So, we can
either remove the sources at Mojo right away or just wait until they are
sufficiently orphaned ;-) (I assume you will continue your contribution
to the ANTLR project's branch).
and can anyone see any disadvantages to such a move?
Obviously loosing the SVN history, not sure how important that is though
;-)
Benjamin
[0] http://www.nabble.com/-vote--fate-of-shade-plugin-to12565124.html
[1]
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Move-cobertura-maven-plugin-to-cobertura.sourceforge.net-to10951839.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
