Really? I think it far too verbose during day to day development. If one is having dependency problems then running with -X isn't too much of a problem. What do you think?
Mark 2009/1/21 Olivier Lamy <[email protected]>: > As we don't have the WEB-INF/lib to see dependencies, personnally I > like the info level to see dependencies used by tomcat > > -- > Olivier > > 2009/1/21 <[email protected]>: >> Revision 8854 Author mark Date 2009-01-21 03:31:22 -0600 (Wed, 21 Jan 2009) >> >> Log Message >> >> Moved run goal artifact logging to debug level >> >> Modified Paths >> >> trunk/mojo/tomcat-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/codehaus/mojo/tomcat/RunMojo.java >> >> Diff >> >> Modified: >> trunk/mojo/tomcat-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/codehaus/mojo/tomcat/RunMojo.java >> (8853 => 8854) >> >> --- >> trunk/mojo/tomcat-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/codehaus/mojo/tomcat/RunMojo.java >> 2009-01-21 >> 09:25:22 UTC (rev 8853) >> +++ >> trunk/mojo/tomcat-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/codehaus/mojo/tomcat/RunMojo.java >> 2009-01-21 >> 09:31:22 UTC (rev 8854) >> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ >> // skip provided and test scoped artifacts >> if ( !Artifact.SCOPE_PROVIDED.equals( scope ) && >> !Artifact.SCOPE_TEST.equals( scope ) ) >> { >> - getLog().info( artifact.getGroupId() + ":" + >> artifact.getArtifactId() + ":" + artifact.getVersion() >> + getLog().debug( artifact.getGroupId() + ":" + >> artifact.getArtifactId() + ":" + artifact.getVersion() >> + ":" + artifact.getScope() ); >> >> loader.addRepository( >> artifact.getFile().toURL().toString() ); >> >> ________________________________ >> >> To unsubscribe from this list please visit: >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
