MSCMCHGLOG-10 created ;)
Emmanuel

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:

> yup, with respect to moving this change to 1.2 you'll get a
> +1
> from me too ;)
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> --- Emmanuel Hugonnet <[email protected]> schrieb am Do, 5.2.2009:
>
> > Von: Emmanuel Hugonnet <[email protected]>
> > Betreff: Re: [mojo-dev] [Vote] Scmchangelog-maven-plugin
> > An: [email protected]
> > Datum: Donnerstag, 5. Februar 2009, 14:32
> > Hi,
> > Yes I agree with you that I should have an adapter for each
> > scm with the
> > current adapter as a wrapper, the question I need to think
> > about is how
> > should I inject the correct adapter into the wrapper
> > (through the
> > constructor like the ScmManager and the grammar, or with a
> > static map).
> > Also I agree with you for the interface SvnGrammar and its
> > descendants which
> > should be renamed ScmGrammar etc. The same is to be applied
> > to SvnTargetEnum
> > and SvnLogEntry.
> > Adding Hg was more a proof of concept than a real
> > integration and it shows
> > through these misnamings ;o) I will put this into JIRA.
> > As it is cosmetic and add no functionnality I would rather
> > refactor for the
> > 1.2 version, pushing the current stable (as with not bug
> > entry left) into
> > production so current users can take advantage of the NPE
> > correction and the
> > filter parameter and I can get more feedbacks.
> > Thanks for your remarks.
> > Emmanuel
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Mark Struberg
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Emmanuel!
> > >
> > > > > In general, I would prefer to have Hg and
> > Svn specific
> > > > code only in their
> > > > > own packages, using interfaces to access
> > them. I
> > > > personally don't think it's
> > > > > a good idea to have getSvnXxxx and getHgXxxx
> > functions
> > > > in one file.
> > > > > Otherwise I fear this will cause a problem
> > in
> > > > maintaining the code later if
> > > > > other scm providers will be added.
> > > >
> > > > You are right, but the ScmManager doesn't
> > provide such
> > > > facility, maybe this
> > > > should move to the provider.
> > >
> > > Sorry, I was not clear enough: I didn't mean to
> > move this code over to the
> > > ScmManager, but only to move those few bits which are
> > still mixed
> > > (getSvnListOfReleases, getHgListOfReleases) to the
> > already existing packages
> > > org.codehaus.mojo.scmchangelog.scm.hg and
> > > org.codehaus.mojo.scmchangelog.scm.svn
> > > and call them via interface or kind of SPI.
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > >
> > > --- Emmanuel Hugonnet <[email protected]>
> > schrieb am Do, 5.2.2009:
> > >
> > > > Von: Emmanuel Hugonnet
> > <[email protected]>
> > > > Betreff: Re: [mojo-dev] [Vote]
> > Scmchangelog-maven-plugin
> > > > An: [email protected]
> > > > Datum: Donnerstag, 5. Februar 2009, 11:54
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Mark Struberg
> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry, but I'd give it a
> > > > > -1
> > > > > because from only taking a glimpse at the
> > xref, the
> > > > code seems a bit mixed
> > > > > up, e.g. in
> > > > >
> > > > > protected List
> > ScmAdapter#getHgListOfReleases(..
> > > > >
> > > > > 201       final ChangeLogScmResult logs =
> > > > this.manager.changeLog(
> > > > > repository,
> > > > > 202           fileSet, getScmVersion(
> > > > SvnTargetEnum.TRUNK, startRevision ),
> > > > > 203           getScmVersion(
> > SvnTargetEnum.TRUNK,
> > > > tag.getEndRevision() ),
> > > > > "" );
> > > > >
> > > > > I personally don't like it much if
> > constants for
> > > > Svn are also used for
> > > > > Mercurial, etc. So maybe, you can simply
> > refactor out
> > > > the real scm provider
> > > > > independent constants (and functionality in
> > general)
> > > > and separate the
> > > > > concerns better?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, I think the Enum name came from the fact
> > that
> > > > historically this was a
> > > > svn only plugin, When we migrated to hg and add
> > potential
> > > > support to other
> > > > scms I did some refactoring but I may have missed
> > some
> > > > renaming.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > In general, I would prefer to have Hg and
> > Svn specific
> > > > code only in their
> > > > > own packages, using interfaces to access
> > them. I
> > > > personally don't think it's
> > > > > a good idea to have getSvnXxxx and getHgXxxx
> > functions
> > > > in one file.
> > > > > Otherwise I fear this will cause a problem
> > in
> > > > maintaining the code later if
> > > > > other scm providers will be added.
> > > >
> > > > You are right, but the ScmManager doesn't
> > provide such
> > > > facility, maybe this
> > > > should move to the provider.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This brings me to the next very basic
> > question: Maybe
> > > > there is a
> > > > > fundamental reason and you already explained
> > it
> > > > (didn't follow the project
> > > > > closely), but is there a reason why you
> > don't use
> > > > the specialized
> > > > > ChangeLogConsumers provided by all the
> > > > maven-scm-providers? Is there any
> > > > > important information missing in the
> > ChangeLogSets
> > > > returned by? Or is the
> > > > > information inside the results that
> > different?
> > > > > If this information is really helpful or you
> > see a
> > > > chance to unify them,
> > > > > you may talk with Jason, Olivier Lamy and
> > Emanuel
> > > > Venisse to extend the
> > > > > scm-API?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes there is also a reason that is explained in
> > the for
> > > > developpers section.
> > > > First I was missing infos with the svn command if
> > I
> > > > didn't use xml (don't
> > > > remember much of it but it was my problem then)
> > and second
> > > > I need a
> > > > BetterChangeSet instead of the simple ChangeSet
> > from hg
> > > > where I can set the
> > > > revision number for the changeset. This info is
> > available
> > > > for most current
> > > > scms but it is not set by scm-api so I am losing
> > some info
> > > > there also.
> > > > That is why I had to override the scm-api.
> > > > Also I do som filtering in the hg tags consumer
> > and
> > > > SvnListConsumer which is
> > > > not available from the scm-api.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > txs and LieGrue,
> > > > > strub
> > > > >
> > > > > Emmanuel
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- Emmanuel Hugonnet
> > <[email protected]>
> > > > schrieb am Mi, 4.2.2009:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Von: Emmanuel Hugonnet
> > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > Betreff: [mojo-dev] [Vote]
> > > > Scmchangelog-maven-plugin
> > > > > > An: [email protected]
> > > > > > Datum: Mittwoch, 4. Februar 2009, 15:54
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We have been working on the
> > > > scmchangelog-maven-plugin and
> > > > > > we have closed all
> > > > > > opened issues.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The snapshot is available at
> > > > > > *
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/mojo/scmchangelog-maven-plugin/1.1-SNAPSHOT
> > > > > > *<
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/mojo/scmchangelog-maven-plugin/1.1-SNAPSHOT
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The new site is available at
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > *http://mojo.codehaus.org/*scmchangelog-maven-plugin<
> > > > >
> > http://mojo.codehaus.org/scmchangelog-maven-plugin>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The change log is available at
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > *http://mojo.codehaus.org/scmchangelog-maven-plugin/changelog.html*<
> > > > >
> > http://mojo.codehaus.org/rpm-maven-plugin>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This vote will be open for 72 hours and
> > will use
> > > > lazy
> > > > > > consensus.
> > > > > > [+1] release it
> > > > > > [0] don't care
> > > > > > [-1] don't release!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rémy & Emmanuel
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> > > > >
> > > > >    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> > >
> > >    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>

Reply via email to