Don't worry.... I initially read your post and though there was significant work done and people were thinking it was ready for a full release...
IMHO the main blocker issue is the same issue that cobertura and clover have with regard to forking the build lifecycle and producing instrumented artifacts.... I suspect that emma can dig itself out of jail somewhat in that it does not *have* to instrument the code before classloading.... but there can be issues with that approach and surefire... which is why the other coverage plugins favour forking the build lifecycle.... -Stephen 2009/3/10 rpelisse <[email protected]> > > Oups, sorry. I thought the emma plugin wasn't release at all... As I tried > it > like a year ago and it was perfectly working for me, i was amazed. I failed > to check this properly sorry. > > (To amend myself, i'll try to look what I can do about the issue is the > emma > plugin) > > > Stephen Connolly-2 wrote: > > > > 2009/3/10 Stephen Connolly <[email protected]> > > > >> -1 > >> > >> I ran the drive to get this out of the sandbox.... So there is an alpha > >> release already available since 4-Oct-2008 > >> > >> I'd be more than happy to run another drive... but at the moment I'm > >> working on versions-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-3... and > >> hudson-maven-invoker-plugin-plugin... once I have them out the door I'll > >> happily run an emma release again (with Alex's support) > >> > >> If we are releasing another alpha... I'm ok to go +1. > >> > >> IMHO, jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1299 is a blocker for a non-alpha > >> release. > > > > > > Scratch that.... perils of reading too fast... > > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1315 is the blocker for a full > > release > > > > > >> > >> > >> If somebody wants to have a look at > >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1314, it has a patch.... not sure > if > >> the patch has integration tests though > >> > >> -Stephen > >> > >> > >> > >> 2009/3/10 rpelisse <[email protected]> > >> > >> > >>> +1 to release the plugin as it is > >>> > >>> Ok, it's not perfect, but no plugin keeps Emma from being use and this > >>> one > >>> is certainly enough to get people interested and hopefully get somebody > >>> to > >>> fix the few issues mentions in other messages. > >>> > >>> To be honest, I don't get what this plugin has been released yet, there > >>> is > >>> a > >>> lot of other plugin far more buggier than this one out there... Is > >>> somebody > >>> shunning Emma ? > >>> -- > >>> View this message in context: > >>> > http://www.nabble.com/-vote--Release-EMMA-plugin-tp15077075p22429324.html > >>> Sent from the mojo - dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >>> > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > >>> > >>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/-vote--Release-EMMA-plugin-tp15077075p22430946.html > Sent from the mojo - dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > >
