2009/4/16 Stephen Connolly <[email protected]>:
> I've no issues with using excludes and not exclude
>
> of course the big issue I see is that all the goals in
> maven-dependency-plugin have different properties doing exactly the
> same thing!
>
> I have to say I like your syntax, as gives a way to specify a complete
> set with one execution.
>
> the other syntaxes are not as flexible....
>
> I guess I'm just looking for some "standard" way and a "standard name"
> for these "standard" ways
The dependency:tree goal was written independently from the rest of
the maven-dependency-plugin and added later, hence the discrepancy.
I'm obviously biased as I also prefer my syntax :) Perhaps see what
everyone else thinks and then we can move to a standard syntax.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
