+0 Haven't test it but I like the idea.

As for surfire, I am not sure that the name failsafe is the best one (we
have to look at the web site in order to understand what the plugin is
doing). I prefer when the name is self-contained, something like
it-maven-plugin.

Rémy

2009/5/22 Stephen Connolly <[email protected]>
>>
>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I think that the failsafe-maven-plugin is ready to cut the first alpha
>>> release. This release is dependent on the release of mojo-parent version 21.
>>>
>>> The Failsafe Plugin is a fork of the Surefire plugin designed to run
>>> integration tests. The name was chosen for both because it is a synonym of
>>> surefire and because it implies that when it fails, it does so in a safe
>>> way.
>>>
>>> The version number for the failsafe-maven-plugin is the version number of
>>> the maven-surefire-plugin upon which it is based, hence this is
>>> 2.4.3-alpha-1 as it is based off of surefire 2.4.3.
>>>
>>> Known issues
>>> * There are currently no known issues.
>>>
>>> The new site has just been deployed here:
>>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/failsafe-maven-plugin
>>>
>>> Snapshot have been published on
>>>
>>> http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/mojo/failsafe-maven-plugin
>>>
>>> [+1] release it [once mojo-parent vesion 21 has been released]
>>> [0] don't care
>>> [-1] don't release !
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours and will conclude via lazy consensus.
>>>
>>> Please vote :-)
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to