[ 
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=179991#action_179991
 ] 

Johan Walles commented on MOJO-1300:
------------------------------------

Wouldn't it be enough just to depend on maven-scm-providers rather than on the 
current explicit list of scm providers?

<dependency>
  <groupId>org.apache.maven.scm</groupId>
  <artifactId>maven-scm-providers</artifactId>
  <version>${maven.scm.version}</version>
</dependency>

maven-scm-providers is described as the "Parent for all SCM providers 
supported.", implying that it will be updated as new providers are added:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/scm/maven-scm-providers/1.2/maven-scm-providers-1.2.pom

I want this as well btw.

> Buildnumber support for Bazaar
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MOJO-1300
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1300
>             Project: Mojo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: buildnumber
>            Reporter: James Kingsbery
>
> My company is looking into alternative to SVN. I have a patch for adding 
> Bazaar support to the build plugin, which has a unit test. I'm waiting for 
> our legal department to OK the contribution.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to