[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MUNIX-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=183028#action_183028
]
Brett Okken commented on MUNIX-1:
---------------------------------
Maybe I am just missing something.
In unix-rpm, there is class org.codehaus.mojo.unix.rpm.RpmUtil[1]. It has a
method:
public static SpecFile getSpecFileFromRpm( File rpm )[2]. The SpecFile class
returned is defined within RpmUtil[3]. This still refers to the release as an
int[4].
[1] -
http://fisheye.codehaus.org/browse/mojo/trunk/mojo/unix/unix-rpm/src/main/java/org/codehaus/mojo/unix/rpm/RpmUtil.java?r=9652
[2] -
http://fisheye.codehaus.org/browse/mojo/trunk/mojo/unix/unix-rpm/src/main/java/org/codehaus/mojo/unix/rpm/RpmUtil.java?r=9652#l186
[3] -
http://fisheye.codehaus.org/browse/mojo/trunk/mojo/unix/unix-rpm/src/main/java/org/codehaus/mojo/unix/rpm/RpmUtil.java?r=9652#l113
[4] -
http://fisheye.codehaus.org/browse/mojo/trunk/mojo/unix/unix-rpm/src/main/java/org/codehaus/mojo/unix/rpm/RpmUtil.java?r=9652#l118
> the "release" portion of the rpm does not have to be an int
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MUNIX-1
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MUNIX-1
> Project: Maven 2.x Unix Plugin
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Brett Okken
> Assignee: Trygve Laugstol
> Fix For: 1.0-alpha-5
>
> Attachments: unix.diff
>
>
> I am by no means an expert in the rpm version rules. However, I know that
> rpms can be created with the release attribute not being a number.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
