is this necessary? I don't like moving away from the standard naming convention if we can help it.
IMHO a better way is to have the tests only run if the was instance exists, e.g. http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-invoker-plugin/examples/selector-conditions.html it may be that we need more selector conditions and that this is the best you can do until we rev invoker again -Stephen 2009/10/7 <[email protected]> > Revision 10859 <http://fisheye.codehaus.org/changelog/mojo/?cs=10859> > Author david Date 2009-10-07 15:35:18 -0500 (Wed, 07 Oct 2009) Log Message > > MWAS-19 <http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MWAS-19>: avoid > being activated at the grid > > Modified Paths > > - > trunk/mojo/was6-maven-plugin/pom.xml<#12430b6924d37986_trunkmojowas6mavenpluginpomxml> > > Diff Modified: trunk/mojo/was6-maven-plugin/pom.xml (10858 => 10859) > > --- trunk/mojo/was6-maven-plugin/pom.xml 2009-10-07 20:21:21 UTC (rev > 10858) > +++ trunk/mojo/was6-maven-plugin/pom.xml 2009-10-07 20:35:18 UTC (rev > 10859)@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ </licenses> > <profiles> > <profile>- <id>run-its</id>+ <id>was6-integration-tests</id> > <activation> > <file> > <exists>${was6.wasHome}</exists> > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >
