Dan wrote: > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think a "codehaus-parent" would be a good idea. >> >> But remember that the "codehaus-parent" would have to enforce the >> noRepositories rule too (or else codehaus would have to stop pushing >> repository.codehaus.org to repo1.maven.org > > the enforcement of noRepositories is how the debate started. and > there fore no point for seperation
To Dan's point, "plugin-parent" would essentially be "codehaus-parent" without the addition of the noRepositories rule. Stephen wrote: > But remember that the "codehaus-parent" would have to enforce the > noRepositories rule too (or else codehaus would have to stop pushing > repository.codehaus.org to repo1.maven.org Isn't this the mojo community supporting the maven community and an example of supporting a wider audience than just the mojo community? What would be the negative effect of discontinuing the push to repo1.maven.org? Thanks for your thoughts in advance. Lee
