Just some more info about git/svn and codehaus hosting.
So there isn't really a nice way to migrate slowly and automatically.

Why would I like native git?
*Easy for external folks to fork and make their stuff available (through github for instance).
*Blistering fast checkouts and updates.
*Local/offline commits

But if there isn't a big YES for this it's not a problem for me to stick to svn (and I can use git as a client).

--
David J. M. Karlsen - +47 90 68 22 43
http://www.davidkarlsen.com
http://mp3.davidkarlsen.com
Sent from my bog-standard SMTP client

--- Begin Message ---
We don't currently have anything setup like that.

What we do currently have is the ability to create you a second
repository using Git, synchronisation is a "user problem".

There is also a capacity issue with large repositories keeping
multiple copies of the same data.  If your repository is small - it
isn't a problem. However we have discovered some projects checking in
6G of JARs.

It is unlikely we'd be able to get any auto-sync stuff in place before
the new year; and I'm not really a big fan of Subversion anyway - it's
slow and clunky - so I don't want to encourage it.
The next task is for us to upgrade Subversion - a particularly large
undertaking due to the number of repositories that need to be
upgraded.


Cheers,

Ben


On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:10 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> From IRC:
>
> [00:59:24]        david | in
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CODEHAUS/Git+-+Migration step 2, what is
> ment by step-by-step migration? . conan
> [00:59:43]        david | sorry, I mean side by side [03:05:22]          bob
> | david: means side-by-side, I presume you keep git and svn and use git-svn
> to keep them in sync until you're ready to switch over
>  .
> [03:05:28]          bob | or mirror git back over to svn [03:07:00]
>  david | bob will there be auto syncing between the two? [03:07:12]
>  bob | david: dunno the details, to be honest [03:07:20]          bob | ping
> support@ for ben's official answer [03:07:27]        david | ok - thx
>
> I wondering what the side-by-side solution offers? Is that a git svn deamon
> dump?
> I'm looking for fast checkouts (which git:// could provide) - but leave the
> main repo as a svn one as I guess this is what most developers are
> confortable with. Being able to avoid doing git svn sync remote would be a
> huge benefit.
>
> David
>
> --
> David J. M. Karlsen - +47 90 68 22 43
> http://www.davidkarlsen.com
> http://mp3.davidkarlsen.com
> Sent from my bog-standard SMTP client
>



-- 
Ben Walding :: [email protected]
Web: http://openxource.com/


--- End Message ---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

Reply via email to