I just notice maven doxia supports latex and there fore
maven-site-plugin also support it as well.

so what is difference between this plugin and the one under doxia?

-Dan

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Julien Ponge <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Nicolas.
>
> The idea was to separate the concerns (having something with -plugin
> as an archetype id is less appealing I think).
>
> Cheers
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:46 AM, nicolas de loof
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Just a suggestion :
>> as an archetype IS a maven-plugin you don't need to have two modules to
>> support an archetype
>> take a look at gwt-maven-plugin as sample
>> Cheers,
>> Nicolas
>> 2010/1/20 Julien Ponge <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I have made good progress over the implementation of the plugin.
>>>
>>> First off it has moved to
>>> https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/sandbox/latex-maven as I have
>>> introduced a parent project to:
>>> * latex-maven-plugin
>>> * latex-maven-archetype [new]
>>>
>>> I have made a few changes according to the feedback I got earlier. I
>>> have also introduced integration tests using maven-invoker-plugin.
>>>
>>> I would be very interested in further feedback before we start to
>>> think about proposing a graduation from the sandbox.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://izpack.org/
>>> http://jpz-log.info/
>>> http://julien.ponge.info/
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>
>>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://izpack.org/
> http://jpz-log.info/
> http://julien.ponge.info/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to