[ 
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MGWT-62?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=222196#action_222196
 ] 

jieryn commented on MGWT-62:
----------------------------

By the way, over on irc.codehaus.org#maven I had a conversation with Brett 
Porter:

09:15:33    jieryn-w : brett: hey.. what do you think should be the min maven 
version supported?
09:15:36    jieryn-w : by a plugin
09:15:45    jieryn-w : we currently support 2.0.9, but would like to move to 
2.1 min
09:16:03    jieryn-w : should we not bother with that and instead mandate 2.2.1 
?
09:16:04       brett : jieryn-w: I would pick either 2.0.9 / JDK 1.4; or 2.2.1 
/ JDK 5
09:16:13       brett : don't bother with 2.1.0 or 2.2.0
09:16:24    jieryn-w : thank you sir


> Possibly bind gwt:compile to the 'prepare-package' phase by default in 'war' 
> projects (maven 2.1)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MGWT-62
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MGWT-62
>             Project: Maven 2.x GWT Plugin
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.1
>            Reporter: Mark Renouf
>            Assignee: nicolas de loof
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0
>
>   Original Estimate: 10 minutes
>  Remaining Estimate: 10 minutes
>
> The gwt:compile goal used to be bound to the 'compile' phase, and it was 
> changed to the 'process-classes' phase. This allowed running mvn:compile to 
> compile java source without triggering the gwt compiler uneccessarily. 
> Maven 2.1 introduces the 'process-package' phase. This seems like a more 
> ideal default phase for gwt:compile within a WAR project. JS compilation is 
> not needed by any intermediate phases. GWTUnitTest does it's own compilation, 
> as well as HostedMode, etc. The only time GWT compiler should be 
> automatically invoked is just prior to packaging.
> In a jar package project, it should remain unbound (as I beleive it is now?).
> I'm not sure if this is possible to do conditionally for only 2.1.x, but it 
> would be nice.
> Alternatively, this is easy to accomplish in your project manually, so if 
> this can't be changed it should be documented under best practices somewhere.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to