[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MHIBERNATE-106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=222851#action_222851
]
Pascal Thivent commented on MHIBERNATE-106:
-------------------------------------------
Thanks for the feedback and... that's awesome! I looked at the new defaults and
they look great, I'm under the impression that they will allow everything to
work out-of-the box, which is good for defaults :) I just wonder why
{{hbm2cfgxml}} doesn't use {{${project.build.directory}}} as destination dir
(like {{hbm2hbmxml}}) which is also the "expected" value for
{{configurationfile}}. Is the generated {{hibernate.cfg.xml}} going to be
copied to {{${project.build.directory}}} at some point? If so, why this extra
step (I may be missing something obvious). Thanks in advance.
> Use ${project.build.directory}/generated-sources/hibernate3 as default
> outputDirectory for hbm2java
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MHIBERNATE-106
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MHIBERNATE-106
> Project: Maven 2.x Hibernate Plugin
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: hbm2java
> Affects Versions: 2.0-alpha-2, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 3.0, 2.3
> Reporter: Pascal Thivent
> Assignee: Johann Reyes
> Priority: Minor
>
> AFAIK, the Maven convention is to use
> {{${project.build.directory}/generated-sources/<generator-name>}} for
> generated code. This is just a convention ([inherited from Maven
> 1|http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg77749.html]) but I
> know that IDEs still rely on it:
> - see [this page|http://www.jetbrains.net/devnet/thread/283102] for IDEA
> - or [this one|http://wiki.netbeans.org/MavenBestPractices] for NetBeans
> Following it would thus be handy when importing projects relying on code
> generation. And from what I've seen while searching for an existing issue, it
> seems that lot of people are actually using this convention so I have the
> feeling that making it the default would make sense.
> I understand that such a change would break the consistency with the output
> directories of other components but... it would be more consistent with the
> way many other plugins work.
> What do you think?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
