+1 On 19 September 2010 17:55, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@codehaus.org> wrote:
> License This program is free software licensed under the BSD > license<http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.html>, > the *head* subproject (the code which is attached to the wrapped jars) is > licensed under the MIT > license<http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html>. > Launch4j may be used for wrapping closed source, commercial applications. > > (from http://launch4j.sourceforge.net/) > > About the app-layout, I can't answer that right now. I should investigate > it, but I expect there should be someone else who can answer that. > > > From: br...@apache.org > > Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 09:47:57 -0700 > > To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org > > Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [proposal] add launch4j to appassembler > > > > > What's the license on launch4j? > > > > Does it require a similar app layout? > > > > I'm not opposed, though also inclined towards splitting the JSW part out > and keeping them all separate but able to work on an assembled directory. > > > > On 19/09/2010, at 9:29 AM, Robert Scholte wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > One of the plugin-submissions under jira is the so-called 'native > executable wrapper plugin'[1], based on launch4j. > > > It think there's some room under the appassembler[2] to add this as a > new goal, something like "generate-executables". > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > -Robert > > > > > > [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-176 > > > [2] http://mojo.codehaus.org/appassembler > > > > -- > > Brett Porter > > br...@apache.org > > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > >
