Hi Mark,
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> There are a few things which cannot be fixed without binding the plugin to a
> specific OpenJPA version. This is only possible if we move the plugin over
> from codehaus to the OpenJPA tools project.
>
> I will call a [DISCUSS] or [VOTE] for the move on this list shortly.
Yep, that makes sense to me. Recently at Codehaus, for gwt-m-p, we
migrated to a lock step versioning system where the plugin versions
would mirror the upstream GWT project's versioning. This is working
out quite well, and maintains Codehaus control over the plugin. I
easily can think of some advantages to having upstream here take over
the care and feeding of the plugin though...
Perhaps I should just wait for the DISCUSS to come out, thanks Mark!
-Jesse
--
There are 10 types of people in this world, those
that can read binary and those that can not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
