I followed the steps at [0] (except that I use MacGPG).

I did the same thing for your signature of mojo-parent:27 and I get the same
warning message as you're getting when verifying my signature. I'm not PGP
guru, but I believe this is normal as the public key is not signed by a
trusted authority.
If you try some other signed artifact (by someone else), I would expect that
you get the same message. I always do at least.

Could someone confirm that there is no issue, please?

/Anders

[0]
http://mojo.codehaus.org/development/performing-a-release.html#Making_GPG_Keys

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 22:11, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@codehaus.org>wrote:

>  *gpg --verify jboss-packaging-maven-plugin-2.2.jar.asc
> *gpg: Signature made 01/10/11 22:45:02 using RSA key ID C66C0F69
> gpg: Good signature from "Anders Hammar (CODE SIGNING KEY) <
> anders.g.ham...@gmail.com>"
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> owner.
> Primary key fingerprint: 2A5A B419 C0FB 38AB 767A  AD2C 4B3F 4EDD C66C 0F69
>
> Top verify it with one of my own releases:
> *gpg --verify mojo-parent-27.pom.asc
> *gpg: Signature made 10/05/10 21:54:33 using DSA key ID 763C98BF
> gpg: Good signature from "Robert Scholte <rfscho...@codehaus.org>"
>
> Seems like you haven't done all the steps yet.
> btw, why do this manually? Shouldn't this automaticly be checked with every
> release? Sounds like the m-gpg-p is missing a goal... :)
>
> -Robert
>
> > Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:28:35 -0600
> > From: pg...@redhat.com
> > To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org
> > Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release JBoss Packaging Maven Plugin
> version 2.2
>
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Works ok for me.
> >
> > On 01/11/2011 01:36 AM, Anders Hammar wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'd like to release version 2.2 of the JBoss Packaging Maven Plugin.
> > >
> > > We solved 3 issues:
> > >
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11731&version=17054
> > > <
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11731&version=17054
> >
> > >
> > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> > >
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+MJBOSSPACK+AND+status+%3D+Open+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide
> > > <
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+MJBOSSPACK+AND+status+%3D+Open+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide
> >
> > >
> > > Staging Repositories:
> > > General: https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/staging/
> > > Exclusive:
> > > https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/orgcodehausmojo-021/
> > >
> > > (Staging) Site:
> > > http://mojo.codehaus.org/jboss-packaging-maven-plugin/
> > >
> > > SCM Tag:
> > > https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/jboss-packaging-maven-plugin-2.2
> > >
> > > As this is my first release here at Codehaus Mojo, I'd appreciate if at
> > > least one other person could do a more thorough review of the release
> > > (including the GPG signatures).
> > >
> > > [ ] +1
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1
> > >
> > > The vote is open for 72 hours and will succeed by lazy consensus.
> > >
> > >
> > > /Anders
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >
> > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to