[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOBERTURA-137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=258452#action_258452
]
Jim Sellers commented on MCOBERTURA-137:
----------------------------------------
One work around that I looked at was to config the tx to proxy the class, but
that caused other issues. Ideally if the code works for the unit tests and in
the containers, I shouldn't have to make changes to get cobertura to run.
{code:xml}
<tx:annotation-driven proxy-target-class="true"/>
{code}
> fails when using security annotations on concrete classes
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MCOBERTURA-137
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOBERTURA-137
> Project: Maven 2.x Cobertura Plugin
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.4
> Environment: Apache Maven 2.1.0 (r755702; 2009-03-18 15:10:27-0400)
> Java version: 1.5.0_16
> Java home: C:\devtools\java\jdk1.5.0_16\jre
> Default locale: en_CA, platform encoding: Cp1252
> OS name: "windows xp" version: "5.1" arch: "x86" Family: "windows"
> spring 3.0.5.RELEASE
> Reporter: Jim Sellers
> Attachments: CoberturaIssue.zipx
>
>
> When using the spring @PreAuthorize security annotation (which I assume
> creates a proxy using cglib), when running cobertura it fails. The failure
> is a bit confusing because it gives an autowiring error.
> I've attached a sample app. If you run "mvn test" it works, but running "mvn
> cobertura:cobertura" it fails.
> I'm not sure if it's a conflict in libs or if one byte code lib is wiping out
> the code from another.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
