If I a .htaccess file, I should remove the content of the folder, right? I'm asking as all files in (for example) groovy and groovy-maven-plugin still exists on the web server, but there is a redirect in the .htaccess file. It looks like the only folder that has been clean, when adding a .htaccess file, is jboss-sar-maven-plugin.
/Anders On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 20:27, Anders Hammar <[email protected]> wrote: > Sure, we could do a redirect to the main page. > > /Anders > > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 20:17, Robert Scholte <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Ok, I just checked those folders, they both contain several pages and >> subfolders. You never know if there are still references any of those pages. >> I think redirecting to the plugin page (or main page, which is maybe even >> better) is cleaner than a 404 >> >> -Robert >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 20:02:48 +0100 >> >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] Old mojo site at >> http://mojo.codehaus.org/mojo-site/ >> >> >> Thus one also exists, which is even older: >> http://mojo.codehaus.org/site/ >> >> But why should it refer to the plugin page? These two urls are for removed >> projects, it's very old instances of the main Codehaus Mojo site. >> >> /Anders >> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 18:28, Robert Scholte <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> I think you should add a htaccess file and refer to the plugin page. >> See the resources-folder for the usage of other (re)moved projects[1] >> >> -Robert >> >> [1] http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/site/src/site/resources/ >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 10:01:05 +0100 >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [mojo-dev] Old mojo site at http://mojo.codehaus.org/mojo-site/ >> >> >> I found a (very) old version of the Mojo site at >> http://mojo.codehaus.org/mojo-site/ >> >> It should be totally safe to remove that, right? >> >> /Anders >> >> >> >
