fixed...
On 19 April 2011 10:38, Stephen Connolly
<[email protected]> wrote:
> yeah I'll fix that
>
> On 19 April 2011 10:36, Anders Hammar <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Great, +1!
>>
>> Btw, the BanDuplicateClasses class has quite a few checkstyle issues.
>>
>> /Anders
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:26, Stephen Connolly
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Mojo developers,
>>>
>>> I'd like to promote the extra-enforcer-rules subproject out of the sandbox
>>> and
>>> release version 1.0-alpha-1
>>>
>>> This sub-project is designed to allow for hosting of custom rules for
>>> the enforcer plugin.
>>>
>>> The project site is deployed at:
>>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/extra-enforcer-rules/
>>> and 1.0-alpha-1-SNAPSHOT has been deployed to Codehaus's Snapshot
>>> repository:
>>>
>>> https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/codehaus/mojo/extra-enforcer-rules/1.0-alpha-1-SNAPSHOT/extra-enforcer-rules-1.0-alpha-1-20110419.091232-3.jar
>>>
>>> +!: yeah
>>> 0: wha
>>> -1: nahh
>>>
>>> 72 hours lazy consensus OR more than five +1's whichever comes first! [*]
>>>
>>> -Stephen
>>>
>>> [*] I'm being cheeky with my attempt to release faster so i'm setting
>>> the bar a little higher for a fast vote, and anyway we don't have any
>>> really hard and fast rules for votes at Mojo ;-)
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>
>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email