I believe it's what the mojo archetype creates. Benson, call a vote for removing the site, the code from svn, and all deployed snapshots!
/Anders On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 19:34, Robert Scholte <[email protected]>wrote: > It's even worse: this is the only file: > > http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/sandbox/retroweaver-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/codehaus/mojo/retroweaver/MyMojo.java > sounds like a "hello world" example > > I'd expected it to be something like > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-256 > > -Robert > > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 13:29:02 -0400 > > From: [email protected] > > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] > http://mojo.codehaus.org/retroweaver-maven-plugin/ > > > > If that goal is all that was coded, I can't see any reason to retain > > it unless someone is in the mood to actually create a useful one. > > > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Robert Scholte <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > The normal process for deprecating a plugin is by calling a vote. > > > Reasons are often: > > > - moved to another team/project/etc. > > > - overruled by another plugin > > > - has become part of another plugin (or Maven itself) > > > > > > Some options for the site-documentation: > > > - add a .htaccess file and redirect to the new site > > > - add some bold deprecation-text on the index.html > > > > > > But this seems to be a special case. The site is kind of useless, but I > > > think the plugin might be interesting. > > > Maybe just delete the site, but leave the project in the sandbox. > > > > > > -Robert > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 15:35:07 +0200 > > > From: [email protected] > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] > http://mojo.codehaus.org/retroweaver-maven-plugin/ > > > > > > Your mail triggered me to think about this. Especially in this case > where it > > > looks like a dummy plugin with no use. > > > > > > Does anyone who's been here for a while know if there is such a > process? > > > Should we just vote and then (hopefully) go ahead? > > > > > > /Anders > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 15:30, Benson Margulies <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Is there a process of deleting abandoned sandbox sites to reduce noise > > > and confusion? > > > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Anders Hammar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> Seems to be a sandbox plugin. With all the quality and attention that > > >> implies...:-) > > >> > > >> This specific plugin seems to be a default plugin stub that Jason > created > > >> ages ago. > > >> > > >> /Anders > > >> > > >> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 15:05, Benson Margulies < > [email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Is this alive or dead? Should that rather unhelpful maven site be > there? > > >>> > > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > >>> > > >>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > >
