2011/6/23 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > generally I'm > > +1 for moving the repos from SVN to GIT > > -1 for moving the repo from codehaus.org to github. > Reason is that this would _heavily_ fragment this established community. > Why not just setup a GIT repo at codehaus? This is pretty easy, I could > volunteer on that. >
I just wonder why this would fragment the community ? Do you mean we need a single git repo for all mojo plugins to ensure we can easily share code together (I'm -1 with this option) or maybe that this would fragment the codehaus community (does this really exist ?) > > @Lee Thompson regarding MRELEASE-457 there was a weight between doing a bit > more work in the release manager or putting the logic into maven-scm. > Problem was that putting it into maven-scm would have required us to change > the maven-scm-api. Also there are other issues which would make it hard to > inject this info. You can find most of it in the issue itself or on the > mailing list archives. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > --- On Thu, 6/23/11, Arnaud Héritier <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Arnaud Héritier <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] moving Mojo from svn to git (was: preparing 2.3.0 > release -> github ) > To: [email protected] > Cc: "Codehaus Support" <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, June 23, 2011, 8:30 AM > > I'm backSorry for the delay > Myself I'm not at all in favor to migrate to one Git repo which could be > the case which requires such feature.I think we need to split/convert our > SVN in many Git repositories, one per plugin > > > Thus it is less easy than just converting a svn with trunk/tags/branches > into git because our layout > mojo/tags/mojo-XXX-1.2mojo/trunk/mojo-XXX/ > > > I'm almost sure that tooling to convert SVN2GIT can handle that but due to > the number of plugins we'll need to automate/script it > WDYT ? > Is there someone who know how we could do that without too many issues ? > > > Arnaud > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Lee Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The mojo project will hit the "sparse checkout" issue with the release > plugin > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-457 > I'm not a fan of the fix that is checked in for MRELEASE-457. Would rather > see a subdirectory injected from the pom. > > > Also, would prefer github over a codehaus repo as it is more social. > > > > From: Robert Scholte <[email protected]> > To: > [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 9:32 AM > Subject: [mojo-dev] moving Mojo from svn to git (was: preparing 2.3.0 > release -> github ) > > > > > > > > > > looks like this thread has come to a stop, although there are still some > things to do. > > According to the docs [1] Codehaus is offering a git-repository, so > technically there are no barriers. > > The only thing we still need to do is call for a vote before continuing, > right? > > Arnaud, could you pick this up (you already started it a bit...)? > > > > -Robert > > > > [1] http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CODEHAUS/Git+-+Migration > > > > Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:25:26 +0200 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [gwt] preparing 2.3.0 release -> github > > > > The thread started about moving gwt to Github, but now we're discussion > moving Mojo to Git. > > /Anders > > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 20:08, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I feel a bit dropped into the middle of this. > > Is this thread just about gwt, or is it also about a general plan to > move to git for mojo? > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Kristian Rosenvold > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, I can be "someone". I can also initialize the github mirroring. > > > > > > But "someone else" needs to get the initial repositories set up ;) > > > > Kristian > > > > > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Stephen Connolly > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> by the quotes I assume you are stepping up to be that someone ;-) > >> > >> - Stephen > >> > >> --- > >> Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense > > > >> words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on > the > >> screen > >> > >> On 31 May 2011 07:49, "Kristian Rosenvold" < > [email protected]> > > > >> wrote: > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > >
