Hello, POV (consider it "stallmanesque" if you want :-) ), perso I don't want to see a non profitable organisation (Codehaus) depends on infra provided by a private company (yes AFAIK github is a private company)
FYI I have created some times ago codehaus-mojo organization (https://github.com/codehaus-mojo). We can "easily" setup mirroring mechanism to this place to use pull request mechanism. 2011/6/24 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > I don't care about the name, I care about _who_ will do that? > You would need to duplicate Xircles and a lot other things... > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Fri, 6/24/11, Julien Ponge <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Julien Ponge <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] moving Mojo from svn to git > To: [email protected] > Date: Friday, June 24, 2011, 12:32 PM > > > > We'd better have a "codehaus-mojo" organization I think. > Cheers > > -- > Julien Ponge > http://julien.ponge.info/ > > > On vendredi 24 juin 2011 at 14:29, Mark Struberg wrote: > > +1 for each mojo plugin having it's own git module. This > makes a lot sense because of moving single projects out from codehaus, etc. > Also please note that tags and branches in GIT is over the _whole_ > repository, and _not_ over a subdirectory! > > I'd have no problem with adding more features to maven-scm-providers-git or > the maven-release-plugin/manager, but the tagging and branching would be a > killer. > > We could setup git-submodules to pin those together of course. > > @ndloof: codehaus has a git hosting ability and we would need to signup > codehaus as an organisation at github. But who would maintain that in this > case? > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Fri, 6/24/11, Paul Gier <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Paul Gier <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] moving Mojo from svn to git > To: [email protected] > Date: Friday, June 24, 2011, 1:14 AM > Not sure I understand you. I > wasn't saying we should have a single git > repo, I was suggesting that each plugin/project is located > in it's own > git repo under the common directory "mojo". Instead > of prefixing the > name of the repo with "mojo-". Either way there is > one git repo per > mojo project. This would be somewhat similar to how > the repos would be > set up on github. For example: > > https://github.com/codehaus-mojo/gwt-maven-plugin > https://github.com/codehaus-mojo/buildnumber-maven-plugin > > On the codehaus repo we could have something like > http://git.codehaus.org/mojo/gwt-maven-plugin.git > > On 06/23/2011 05:54 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > until you try to release. > > if you release separately, you need separate git > repositories. > > if you release at the same time, same git repo. > > so animal-sniffer would be one repo for the tools, one > repo for each of > the signatures. > > - Stephen > > --- > Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling > mistakes, random nonsense > words and other nonsense are a direct result of using > swype to type on > the screen > > On 23 Jun 2011 23:41, "Paul Gier" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > -- Olivier Lamy http://twitter.com/olamy | http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
