Hi Christopher, Ok, so ignore my comments about reports. About the version: I 
now see you're talking about "-SNAPSHOT". That kind of confused me, I'd expect 
votes on final version ;)So indeed a +1 -Robert
 From: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:13:49 +1000
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [vote] Graduate the Maven JSLint Plugin version 
1.0.0-SNAPSHOT



Hi Robert,
On 19/08/2011, at 7:59 PM, Robert Scholte wrote:- I think you should rename the 
goal main-jslint to jslint, without this prefix it's already clear it is for 
the main sources.
OK.
- I'm missing a clear description of this plugin. I don't know jslint, but I 
guess it has to do with javascript. From the first page I don't see if it will 
optimize the code or generate a report or something else…
I shall do my best to enhance the description, but really the idea is that you 
already know about JSLint given Doug Crockford's in infamy and you're looking 
to integrate it with your build.
- So it seems it reports to the console? Don't we want to generate reports as 
well to be available during site generation?
Nope. Compare this more with the Java Compiler Plugin. You save a file and you 
want to see whether you've got syntax errors etc.
- Could it be compared with the m-checkstyle-p[1]? It has two goals: 
_checkstyle_ for the report and _check_ to validate it. Same counts for pmd[2]. 
Looks to me you've written the check mojo, not yet the reports (this conflicts 
a bit with my first bullet, but I think you understand)
I don't see the reporting goal as being useful; in the same way that there's no 
reporting for the Java compiler plugin.
 
I think it would indeed be a nice plugin, but IMHO there are a few things which 
need to be changed to let it look more like equivalent plugins (which makes it 
easier to understand for users)
So I'd say -1 for a 1.0.0, but for a beta-1 I'd be happy to give a +1
I'll take that as a +1 then, 'cause all I'm looking for right now is a vote on 
graduation from the sandbox!
Thanks.
Kind regards,Christopher
                                          

Reply via email to