I think the github bit is part of the issue, also I think the release process should be left up to the plugin at this point and mojo's ought to do away with the whole vote, wait a couple of days, release process. It makes sense on maven core but the plugins in mojo are so diverse it makes little sense to delay plugin releases on votes anymore.
change to git and remove the voting requirements on the mojo project and I think things will aggregate back together again cheers, jesse -- jesse mcconnell jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:44, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > To be clear: codehaus also offers git repo hosting. So I see no reason to not > use GIT. > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Mon, 8/29/11, Jesse Farinacci <jie...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> From: Jesse Farinacci <jie...@gmail.com> >> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [DISCUSS] move back github stuff to codehaus >> To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org >> Date: Monday, August 29, 2011, 5:11 PM >> Greetings, >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@codehaus.org> >> wrote: >> > Sure the committers of Sonatype will do their best to >> maintain it, but I >> > agree with Mark: Codehaus would be a better place, >> either svn or git ;) >> >> I think it's probably a good idea to keep things in one >> place. Please, >> git is just far too compelling to not use it. >> >> -Jesse >> >> -- >> There are 10 types of people in this world, those >> that can read binary and those that can not. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
