[ 
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=277663#comment-277663
 ] 

Paul Vonnahme commented on MOJO-1682:
-------------------------------------

I wasn't sure what the original author's intentions were (maybe he had a use 
case for direct dependencies?), so I chose to keep my patch backwards 
compatible.  That's the only reason.  I personally agree it's a bug and there's 
no need for the new option.  Thanks

> Extra option to also check transitive dependencies for duplicates
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MOJO-1682
>                 URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1682
>             Project: Mojo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: extra-enforcer-rules
>            Reporter: Paul Vonnahme
>            Assignee: Robert Scholte
>         Attachments: add_transitive_option.diff
>
>
> I would like to add an extra option so the banDuplicateClasses rule could 
> also check transitive dependencies.  Example configuration would look like:
> <banDuplicateClasses>
>     <includeTransitiveDependencies>true</includeTransitiveDependencies>
>     <findAllDuplicates>true</findAllDuplicates>
>     ..
> </banDuplicateClasses>
> If this is something that would be likely to be applied, I can work on a 
> patch.  Thanks.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to