Simone Tripodi, the initiator of the fluido-skin, is enthousiastic too. We think It could help to make the fluido-skin a success.So it's not only for our mojo-site.I think it doesn't belong in the sandbox anymore. -Robert
---------------------------------------- > Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:12:02 +0100 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Promote the Siteskinner Maven Plugin out of > the Sandbox > > I'm +1, but do we really need to graduate this plugin to use it to > re-skin the mojo doc sites? I'd say they person using it could just > build it and use the snapshot, right? > > /Anders > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 22:07, Robert Scholte <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to promote th siteskinner-maven-plugin out of the Sandbox. > > > > With the Siteskinner Maven Plugin it is possible to regenerate a deployed > > Maven site with a new skin, without touching its content. > > > > Site: > > http://mojo.codehaus.org/siteskinner-maven-plugin/ > > SCM Tag: > > http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/mojo-sandbox-parent-10/siteskinner-maven-plugin > > > > Additional information: > > This plugin can assist us to apply the new fluido-skin on the mojo-sites. > > Although the mojo-site requires some fixes of fluido-skin-1.1, graduating > > this plugin would be the first step to be able to reskin the(/any) site. > > > > [ ] +1 > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 > > > > The vote is open for 72 hours and will succeed by lazy consensus. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Robert Scholte > > > > ps. here´s my +1 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > >
