and mock-repository-manager too ;-) On 27 January 2012 14:02, Stephen Connolly <[email protected]>wrote:
> I would just copy what has been done for animal-sniffer and extra enforcer > rules > > > On 27 January 2012 13:49, Tony Chemit <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I'd like to do soon a release of the keytool-m-p and webstart-m-p which >> need a release of the mojo-keytool. >> >> As the mojo-keytool is part of a new project named >> mojo-shared-components [1], I'd like we discuss how to do a first >> (alpha-1 or beta-1) release of this project. >> >> For the moment the project organisation is like this : >> >> >> sandbox/mojo-shared-components >> ├── mojo-keytool (2) >> ├── mojo-shared-components (1) >> └── pom.xml (0) >> >> where (0) is org.codehaus.mojo.shared:mojo-shared-aggregator >> (1) is org.codehaus.mojo.shared:mojo-shared-components >> (2) is org.codehaus.mojo.shared:mojo-keytool >> >> (0) is the aggreator pom for any sub project >> (1) is the share-components parent pom >> (2) is the first real component of the project >> >> Is that seem ok with you ? >> >> About the site, how could we organize it, Should we have a >> common page for the project (a static site) and then for all real >> components (like mojo-keytool) a real generated site. >> >> Any help or idea to realize this is welcome ;) >> >> >> thanks, >> >> tony. >> >> [1] https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/sandbox/mojo-shared-components >> >> >> ----- >> Tony Chemit >> -------------------- >> tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28 >> email: [email protected] >> http://www.codelutin.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >> >> >> >
