|
||||||||
This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-86) outputFile... Matt Martin (JIRA)
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-86) outpu... Roman Arkadijovych Muntyanu (JIRA)
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-86) outpu... Robert Scholte (JIRA)
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-86) outpu... Robert Scholte (JIRA)
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-86) outpu... Robert Scholte (JIRA)
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-86) outpu... Robert Scholte (JIRA)
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-86) outpu... Kristian Rosenvold (JIRA)
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-86) outpu... Robert Scholte (JIRA)
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-86) outpu... Kristian Rosenvold (JIRA)
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-86) outpu... Robert Scholte (JIRA)
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-86) outpu... Tuure Laurinolli (JIRA)
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MEXEC-86) outpu... Robert Scholte (JIRA)
I think I understand why this was reverted: the outcome very unpredictable. I've written an IT, which switches from stream (out and err) after every line of text. But in the outputfile you won't get the same order. Even if I call the flush() after every new line.
Maybe somebody has a good suggestion.
If it's not written in the correct order, we need to find some other solution.
Some ideas:
WDYT?