I'm responsible for that one. I've seen it quite often, that the unit tests
succeed, but where integration tests fail.Unit tests must always succeed, where
as integration tests are preferred to all succeed. In a case of an IT failure
you can't always fix such issue fast/alone. This setup has to pro's:- you can
immediately see if it is a unit test or IT which causes the job to fail.- you
can (often shouldn't) disable the IT's. Robert> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:13:43
+0200
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [mojo-dev] Why do we have two stages for CI plans?
>
> Why do we have two stages for all/most CI plans? One for unit test and
> one for IT. As you all know IT will also do unit test (at least if we
> don't disable them which we don't). Makes no sense to me, but I guess
> there is some reason?
>
> /Anders
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
