Hi Mirko, 2013/3/15 Mirko Friedenhagen <[email protected]>
> Hello Baptiste, > > * You are quite right, accepted would be much better than expected. > Now I understand it better. What was written was a typo: excepted instead of expected :-). Anyway, in the meantime I also fixed the code since there was also a bug in the code: validRoles was not working. * It is not optionalRoles, but the intention was that you may provide > roles which are accepted additionally, i.e. the union of requiredRoles > and validRoles are allowed (so may additionalValidRoles would have > been a more appropriate name). > Yup. Thanks for clarification. Cheers -- Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net Sauvez un arbre, Mangez un castor !
