OK, thanks. Just created https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/HAUS-2300 I guess it's easier to track than mails :-).
Cheers 2013/3/19 Robert Scholte <codeh...@sourcegrounds.com> > I don't think anybody of us has those rights. > These kind of questions can be send to supp...@codehaus.org > If it requires an action, create a jira issue at > https://jira.codehaus.org/**browse/HAUS<https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/HAUS> > (you don't have to be a despot to do that ;) otherwise I can ask it for > you) > > Robert > > > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:25:19 +0100, Baptiste Mathus <bmat...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, >> >> As a follow-up to the vote still being run, I'd like to check if we have >> the "Staging Checksum Validation" as a ruleset for our staging >> repositories? (See [1] >> >> Though this does not seem to be the case here, that would prevent pushing >> stale data, isn't it? >> >> I checked and it seems I'm not allowed to see that configuration detail. >> Could someone with more rights have a look at that? >> >> If that's already the case, then that's just great :-). >> >> Thanks >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Baptiste MATHUS <bmat...@batmat.net> >> Date: 2013/3/19 >> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release extra-enforcer-rules version >> 1.0-alpha-4 - take 3 >> To: "dev@mojo.codehaus.org" <dev@mojo.codehaus.org> >> >> >> Hi, >> Could you please give more precisions about the issue you're having with >> MD5/SHA1? Which artifacts have wrong hashes from your tests? It would >> help. >> I just verified the extra-enforcer-rules >> jar<https://nexus.codehaus.**org/content/repositories/** >> orgcodehausmojo-036/org/**codehaus/mojo/extra-enforcer-** >> rules/1.0-alpha-4/extra-**enforcer-rules-1.0-alpha-4.jar<https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/orgcodehausmojo-036/org/codehaus/mojo/extra-enforcer-rules/1.0-alpha-4/extra-enforcer-rules-1.0-alpha-4.jar> >> **> >> and >> its md5 <https://nexus.codehaus.org/**content/repositories/** >> orgcodehausmojo-036/org/**codehaus/mojo/extra-enforcer-** >> rules/1.0-alpha-4/extra-**enforcer-rules-1.0-alpha-4.**jar.md5<https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/orgcodehausmojo-036/org/codehaus/mojo/extra-enforcer-rules/1.0-alpha-4/extra-enforcer-rules-1.0-alpha-4.jar.md5> >> >and >> >> it seems correct. Same for sources. >> >> Btw, maybe it's already there, but I agree we shouldn't be able to push >> artifacts with incorrect hashes. I guess/hope there's a staging ruleset >> for >> this. >> >> Thanks >> >> >> 2013/3/18 Fred Cooke <fred.co...@gmail.com> >> >> How about some basics: >>> >>> MD5 and SHA1 of each artifact involved. >>> >>> Codehaus kingpins, how about making this a requirement if something >>> doesn't go through on the first cut? >>> >>> It's just unprofessional to not do this, and not change the version, at >>> the same time. >>> >>> Fred. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Baptiste Mathus <bmat...@gmail.com >>> >wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'd like to release version *1.0-alpha-4* of the >>>> *extra-enforcer-rules*project. >>>> >>>> Note that this is the third try. So, please don't forget to delete your >>>> local version if you already tried the previous release attempt. >>>> >>>> Extra Enforcer Rules is a project containing extra rules for Apache >>>> Maven's Enforcer Plugin. >>>> >>>> We solved 7 issues: >>>> >>>> https://jira.codehaus.org/**secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?** >>>> projectId=11062&version=18450<https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11062&version=18450> >>>> >>>> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: >>>> >>>> https://jira.codehaus.org/**issues/?jql=project%20%3D%** >>>> 20MOJO%20AND%20component%20%**3D%20extra-enforcer-rules%** >>>> 20AND%20resolution%20%3D%**20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%** >>>> 20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%**20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC<https://jira.codehaus.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MOJO%20AND%20component%20%3D%20extra-enforcer-rules%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC> >>>> >>>> Staging Repositories: >>>> General: >>>> https://nexus.codehaus.org/**content/groups/staging/<https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/staging/> >>>> Exclusive: >>>> https://nexus.codehaus.org/**content/repositories/** >>>> orgcodehausmojo-036/<https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/orgcodehausmojo-036/> >>>> >>>> (Staging) Site: >>>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/**extra-enforcer-rules/<http://mojo.codehaus.org/extra-enforcer-rules/> >>>> >>>> SCM Tag: >>>> https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/**tags/extra-enforcer-rules-1.0-** >>>> alpha-4/<https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/extra-enforcer-rules-1.0-alpha-4/> >>>> >>>> Note that this version includes two new rules: >>>> >>>> - enforcerBytecodeVersion : rule to check that bytecode of >>>> >>>> dependencies is not higher than expected >>>> - banCircularDependencies : rule to prevent having circular >>>> >>>> dependencies >>>> >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 >>>> [ ] +0 >>>> [ ] -1 >>>> >>>> The vote is open for 72 hours and will succeed by lazy consensus. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Baptiste >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- > Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/**manage_email<http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email> > > > -- Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net Sauvez un arbre, Mangez un castor !
