|
||||||||||||||
This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MBUILDNUM-104) Sequential buil... JIRA
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MBUILDNUM-104) Sequential... Rickard von Essen (JIRA)
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MBUILDNUM-104) Sequential... Baptiste Mathus (JIRA)
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MBUILDNUM-104) Sequential... JIRA
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MBUILDNUM-104) Sequential... JIRA
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MBUILDNUM-104) Sequential... Rickard von Essen (JIRA)
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MBUILDNUM-104) Sequential... JIRA
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MBUILDNUM-104) Sequential... JIRA
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MBUILDNUM-104) Sequential... JIRA
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MBUILDNUM-104) Sequential... Baptiste Mathus (JIRA)
- [mojo-dev] [jira] (MBUILDNUM-104) Sequential... Baptiste Mathus (JIRA)
I'm sorry but I agree with Rickard.
I think it's a really bad idea to use that kind of command.
Btw, off the top of my head, if you really want a not-so-meaningful number, then you can use whatever is the build number of your CI server, of even the System.currentTimeMillis() /time-zone adjusted/ value at the moment of the build. At least, that should give you an almost interesting value.
Cheers