Thanks Robert. Here's my +1 btw. Le 5 nov. 2013 19:40, "Robert Scholte" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> There were duplicate issues, so in fact only 2 are resolved. > I've fixed this for MOJO-1915 > > Robert > > Op Tue, 05 Nov 2013 10:19:24 +0100 schreef Baptiste Mathus <[email protected] > >: > > Hi, >> >> I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-2 of the extra-enforcer-rules. >> >> These are extra rules for Apache Maven's Enforcer Plugin. >> >> We solved 3 issues: >> https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? >> projectId=11062&version=19563 >> >> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: >> https://jira.codehaus.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D% >> 20MOJO%20AND%20component%20%3D%20extra-enforcer-rules% >> 20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY% >> 20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC >> >> Staging Repositories: >> General: https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/staging/ >> Exclusive: >> https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/orgcodehausmojo-1026/ >> >> (Staging) Site: >> http://mojo.codehaus.org/extra-enforcer-rules/ >> >> SCM Tag: >> https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/extra-enforcer-rules-1.0-beta-2 >> >> Basically, this releases mainly includes an evolution for the >> enforceBytecodeVersion rule to be able to exclude some classes from the >> enforcement (thanks Jesse & Kohsuke). >> >> [ ] +1 >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1 >> >> The vote is open for 72 hours and will succeed by lazy consensus. >> >> Cheers >> -- Baptiste >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > >
