I've filed a HAUS ticket for the missing login link.

/Anders (mobile)
Den 21 apr 2014 23:12 skrev "Baptiste Mathus" <bmat...@batmat.net>:

> FYI, just committed the associated modification in r19666. Now the IT run
> in target/it as usually found. The CI still fails, but at least now I have
> a BUILD SUCCESS locally.
>
> If someone can confirm buildnumber-m-p 'mvn clean verify' now run
> correctly on their machine, that'd be great.
>
> About the CI envt, IIRC, I have to configure something like "artifacts" to
> be able to retrieve a part of the remote workspace? Can't find the login
> button anymore... So, I'm currently unable to know what's making the CI
> fail (and I don't like it, I miss you Jenkins :)).
>
> Cheers
>
> 2014-04-20 13:57 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Mathus <bmat...@batmat.net>:
>
>>
>> Le 20 avr. 2014 13:09, "Stephen Connolly" <
>> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sunday, 20 April 2014, Robert Scholte <codeh...@sourcegrounds.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Op Sat, 19 Apr 2014 23:04:33 +0200 schreef Karl Heinz Marbaise <
>> khmarba...@gmx.de>:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Baptiste,
>> >>>
>> >>>  > Back to trying to keep going to be able to release as I said I
>> would,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I'm working on some jiras.
>> >>>> The thing is, I noticed I have 3 ITs that fail locally. They also
>> fail
>> >>>> in Bamboo (
>> https://bamboo-ci.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-MBUILDNUM-45/log).
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> The same here on my local machine....
>> >>
>> >> Same here
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I think the issue with two of the ITs is about the svnkit version in
>> use
>> >>>> (1.3.5): it's too old and I guess it's not able to deal with the
>> 1.7+.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> yeah that looks so...this one has failed: *  basic-it-svnjava/pom.xml
>> >>>
>> >>> and with those messages which affirmed your assumptions...
>> >>>
>> >>>    at org.codehaus.mojo.build.CreateMojo.info(CreateMojo.java:770)
>> >>>    at
>> org.codehaus.mojo.build.CreateMojo.getRevision(CreateMojo.java:706)
>> >>>    ... 22 more
>> >>> Caused by: org.apache.maven.scm.ScmException: svn: E155021: This
>> client is too old to work with the working copy at
>> >>> '/Users/kama/workspace/buildnumber-maven-plugin' (format {1}).
>> >>>    at
>> org.apache.maven.scm.provider.svn.svnjava.command.info.SvnJavaInfoCommand.executeSingleInfoCommand(SvnJavaInfoCommand.java:111)
>> >>>
>> >>> The same with MOJO-1668:
>> >>>
>> >>> Caused by: org.apache.maven.scm.ScmException: svn: E155021: This
>> client is too old to work with the working copy at
>> >>> '/Users/kama/workspace/buildnumber-maven-plugin' (format {1}).
>> >>>    at
>> org.apache.maven.scm.provider.svn.svnjava.command.info.SvnJavaInfoCommand.executeSingleInfoCommand(SvnJavaInfoCommand.java:108)
>> >>>    at
>> org.apache.maven.scm.provider.svn.svnjava.command.info.SvnJavaInfoCommand.executeInfoCommand(SvnJavaInfoCommand.java:71)
>> >>>    at
>> org.apache.maven.scm.provider.svn.svnjava.command.info.SvnJavaInfoCommand.executeCommand(SvnJavaInfoCommand.java:48)
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> So, to sum up, I guess I'm gonna have to touch some ITs to make them
>> >>>> run. For example, I'm gonna have to modify the basic-it & MOJO-1668
>> ones
>> >>>> from 1.7.4-v1 to 1.8.3-1 (that fixes the issue on my machine).
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I wouldn't see any alternative...
>> >>>
>> >>>> Another issue that surprised me: the current codebase configures the
>> >>>> <cloneProjectsTo> property to src/it instead of target/it. Is this
>> >>>> intended? It seems weird to me to write in some versionned directory
>> >>>> during the build, but maybe there's a reason? I guess I'll fix that
>> also
>> >>>> in the go to separate sources and outputDirectory cleanly. See below
>> >>>> about IT modification, btw.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Yes that's really weird....
>> >>
>> >> This looks like a lazy solution because the .svn folder isn't copied.
>> This calls for a better solution.
>> >
>> >
>> > Yes, unzipping the test resources would be a better plan imho
>>
>> OK. No problem and your right, I guess I'll proceed the same way I did
>> for ARCHETYPE-456: have a "DotSVN" directory in the test tree that I'll
>> rename ".svn" after copy using a prepare script as supported by m-invoker-p.
>>
>> IIUC, there's also a preference to just upgrade the IT configuration, so
>> I'll do that too.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> >
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> About those ITs, they're using the old invoker form, using goals.txt
>> and
>> >>>> so on.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> SO, the question: do we want to agree on something about modifying
>> >>>> existing ITs in general? For example
>> >>>> [ ] Upgrade them all to the up-to-date way of doing ?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I would suggest to upgrade them to the up-to-date way of doing cause
>> this will make maintenance more easier in the future...and will remove the
>> older plugin version over the time....
>> >>>
>> >> With the introduction of svn 1.7 I've already seen several format
>> changes. I'm not sure if it is stable enough right now. Maybe we should
>> think of another approach where we have more control over the format.
>> >>
>> >>>> [ ] have two distinct IT directories, say it-old that we don't touch
>> and
>> >>>> configure another m-invoker-p execution with the latest version of
>> the
>> >>>> plugin (or using the same, another question?) ?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Hm...i don't like that idea...You might start on a local branch to be
>> sure you don't break something but i don't see as a strategy....
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >> Please don't, just fix it properly. Nobody will look to an old setup
>> if the new one is used.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Well, I don't know if I will get a lot of answers/opinions here, but
>> I
>> >>>> wanted at least to see if there were advices on some recommended way
>> >>>> based on past experience here.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> You get at least one ..;-)
>> >>>
>> >>> Kind regards
>> >>> Karl-Heinz Marbaise
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> >>>
>> >>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> >>
>> >>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sent from my phone
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net
> Sauvez un arbre,
> Mangez un castor !
>

Reply via email to