I advocate to push it to maven central since other project can use it as
well including my internal plugin development. BTW, I have a really need
for this.

What would it take todo so? should we push it as alpha while waiting for
more concrete decision?

-D






On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Robert Scholte <codeh...@sourcegrounds.com>
wrote:

> Hi Dan,
>
> I see some comparison with one of my old plugins.
> About 2,5 years ago I started the setup-maven-plugin[1]
> Main reasons were:
> - the maven-install-plugin doesn't install Maven.
> - there are a lot of unknown configuration files for Maven.
> By bundling these into 1 plugin I hoped it could help the community.
> However, the plugin only works if:
> - it is in Maven central
> - the user can or is allowed to connect to Maven Central (users with a
> Repository Manager are kind of doomed)
> Otherwise the user still has to define its own settings.xml.
> So here we have our chicken-egg problem, though I still think that the
> base is good.
>
> So the "mojo" part of the name of your plugin means actually Mojo as in
> Maven-Plugin instead of the Codehaus Mojo team.
> I still think that "prepare-environment" is correct, but you should be
> able to add an argument for which certificates should be installed. So "
> codehaus.org" should map to the already specified URL's.
> The prepare-eclipse is actually also Codehaus Mojo specific.
> The only general thing is prepare-project, which could be enriched with
> other scm types.
>
> IMHO we should make a decision: either make it for the mojo-team only and
> don't push it to Maven Central or make it for maven-plugin development in
> general and make it more configurable, e.g. by URL.
>
> Robert
>
> [1] http://mojo.codehaus.org/setup/setup-maven-plugin/index.html
>
> Op Sun, 29 Jun 2014 01:20:57 +0200 schreef Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com>:
>
>
>  Hi Robert,
>>
>> I think this plugin is helpful for those using Maven code style. Apache
>> Maven and MOJO dev team can use it..
>>
>> I also has the another Maven SCM Provider for Perforce using P4Java hosted
>> at workshop.perforce.com
>>
>> That is why it is needed at Maven Central.
>>
>> The only unrelated goal is prepare-environment, perhaps I should change it
>> back to 'import-codehaus-certificates.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -Dan
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Robert Scholte <
>> codeh...@sourcegrounds.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  I agree with Baptiste here.
>>>
>>> I'm also wondering if this project should be pushed to Maven central,
>>> since it's first of all a codehaus mojo specific plugin.
>>>
>>> so -1
>>>
>>> Robert
>>>
>>>
>>> Op Sat, 28 Jun 2014 00:19:47 +0200 schreef Baptiste Mathus <
>>> bapti...@codehaus.org>:
>>>
>>>  I'm not personally worried, actually. I didn't make the rules BTW, I'm
>>>
>>>> still a newcomer here. I don't know the discussions that came to define
>>>> that process neither, but let's just say that would be simpler next time
>>>> to
>>>> just stick to it I suppose. It's not that he heavyweight IMO.
>>>>
>>>> So I won't vote -1 just for that, sure. Just carry on if nobody else
>>>> complains.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the work.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Le 28 juin 2014 00:13, "Dan Tran" <dant...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>  I would like do it in one shot for this small mojo.   Unless you'd like
>>>>
>>>>> me
>>>>> to rephase vote, or create 2 votes
>>>>>
>>>>> -D
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Baptiste Mathus <bmat...@batmat.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  I hate doing that, and hope I just missed it: didn't you forget to
>>>>> first
>>>>>
>>>>>> call a vote to just go out of sandbox?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/development/performing-a-
>>>>>> release.html#Graduating_from_the_Sandbox
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2014-06-26 22:51 GMT+02:00 Garvin LeClaire <garvin.lecla...@gmail.com
>>>>>> >:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Garvin LeClaire
>>>>>>> garvin.lecla...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would like cut the first beta release of this mojodev-maven-plugin
>>>>>>>> which has  a number of productivity goals used by
>>>>>>>> Codehaus'MOJO/Apache
>>>>>>>> Maven teams.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Staging Repositories:
>>>>>>>> General:  https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/staging/
>>>>>>>> Exclusive: *https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>> orgcodehausmojo-1101
>>>>>>>> <https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>> orgcodehausmojo-1101
>>>>>>>> >*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (Staging) Site:
>>>>>>>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/mojodev-maven-plugin/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> SCM Tag:
>>>>>>>> http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/mojodev-maven-plugin-1.
>>>>>>>> <http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/mojodev-maven-plugin-1.0-beta-1>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 0-beta-1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1
>>>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours and will succeed by lazy consensus.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Dan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net
>>>>>> Sauvez un arbre,
>>>>>> Mangez un castor !
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>
>>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>
>>>
>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>

Reply via email to