I filed a ticket for this:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASPECTJ-135

Feel free to add more info as you see fit.

/Anders


On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Sergei, you are right, i have a convenient script to 'cd' into my dev
> tree like this
>
> @echo off
> cd c:\views\dev
>
>
> so the fix is ( for now)
>
> @echo off
> cd C:\views\dev
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Sergei Ivanov <sergei_iva...@mail.ru>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> Looks like the drive letter C: differs in case between expected and
>> actual. You may want to change the test script to use case-insensitive
>> comparison on windows.
>>
>> Regards,
>> --
>> Sergei Ivanov
>>
>>
>>
>> Wednesday, 20 August 2014 07:26 +0100 from Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> no problem building on linux for both java 7 and 8
>>
>> also works inside my windows eclipse IDE.
>>
>> Must have someting to do with my env.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -D
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Dan Tran < dant...@gmail.com > wrote:
>> >not sure why, but i am not able to build it locally using both java 7
>> and 8  on windows (have not try it on linux yet )
>> >
>> >[INFO] Building: JavaSourcesDefault\pom.xml
>> >[INFO] run script verify.groovy
>> >[INFO] ..FAILED (2.7 s)
>> >[INFO]   The post-build script did not succeed. assert
>> execLine.endsWith( fooClazz.getAbsolutePath() )
>> >       |        |         |        |
>> >       |        false     |
>>  
>> c:\views\dev\mojo\mojo\aspectj-maven-plugin\target\it\JavaSourcesDefault\src\main\java\foo\Clazz.java
>> >       |
>>  
>> c:\views\dev\mojo\mojo\aspectj-maven-plugin\target\it\JavaSourcesDefault\src\main\java\foo\Clazz.java
>> >       [DEBUG] Running : ajc -1.4 -classpath
>> C:\views\dev\mojo\mojo\aspectj-maven-plugin\target\local-repo\org\aspectj\aspectjrt\1.8.0\aspectjrt-1.8.0.jar;C:\views\dev\mojo\mojo\aspectj-maven-plugin\t
>> >arget\it\JavaSourcesDefault\target\classes -d
>> C:\views\dev\mojo\mojo\aspectj-maven-plugin\target\it\JavaSourcesDefault\target\classes
>> C:\views\dev\mojo\mojo\aspectj-maven-plugin\target\it\JavaSourcesD
>> >efault\src\main\java\foo\Clazz.java
>> >[INFO] Building: JavaSourcesEmpty\pom.xml
>> >[INFO] run script verify.groovy
>> >[INFO] ..SUCCESS (2.1 s)
>> >[INFO] Building: JavaSourcesList\pom.xml
>> >[INFO] run script verify.groovy
>> >[INFO] ..FAILED (2.5 s)
>> >[INFO]   The post-build script did not succeed. assert
>> execLine.endsWith( fooClazz.getAbsolutePath() )
>> >       |        |         |        |
>> >       |        false     |
>>  
>> c:\views\dev\mojo\mojo\aspectj-maven-plugin\target\it\JavaSourcesList\src\java\foo\Clazz.java
>> >       |
>>  
>> c:\views\dev\mojo\mojo\aspectj-maven-plugin\target\it\JavaSourcesList\src\java\foo\Clazz.java
>> >       [DEBUG] Running : ajc -1.4 -classpath
>> C:\views\dev\mojo\mojo\aspectj-maven-plugin\target\local-repo\org\aspectj\aspectjrt\1.8.0\aspectjrt-1.8.0.jar;C:\views\dev\mojo\mojo\aspectj-maven-plugin\t
>> >arget\it\JavaSourcesList\target\classes -d
>> C:\views\dev\mojo\mojo\aspectj-maven-plugin\target\it\JavaSourcesList\target\classes
>> C:\views\dev\mojo\mojo\aspectj-maven-plugin\target\it\JavaSourcesList\sr
>> >c\java\foo\Clazz.java
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Lennart Jörelid <
>> lennart.jore...@gmail.com > wrote:
>> >>Yes.
>> >>
>> >>We have presently some Bamboo setup issues, but the code has built
>> locally for me since quite awhile.
>> >>Thus, it is presently more of a Bamboo issue than a development one.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>2014-08-19 22:42 GMT+02:00 Dan Tran < dant...@gmail.com > :
>> >>
>> >>>Hello MOJO team,
>> >>>
>> >>>any plan to push 1.7 out for JDK 8 support?
>> >>>
>> >>>Thanks
>> >>>
>> >>>-D
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>--
>> >>--
>> +==============================+
>> | Bästa hälsningar,
>> | [sw. "Best regards"]
>> |
>> | Lennart Jörelid
>> | EAI Architect & Integrator
>> |
>> | jGuru Europe AB
>> | Mölnlycke - Kista
>> |
>> | Email: l...@jguru.se
>> | URL: www.jguru.se
>> | Phone
>> | (skype): jgurueurope
>> | (intl): +46 708 507 603
>> | (domestic): 0708 - 507 603
>> +==============================+
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to