Hi Dan, Let's see if I understand you correctly here. Do you mean that:
1. Building AspectJ Maven Plugin version 1.7 (i.e. corresponding to svn revision 19957) from source fails in one of the unit tests for you? I have built the release from source checkouts on Mac OS X and Linux several times without any problems, so I can't repeat your exception (recent maven specs shown below). Also, all the Codehaus Bamboo jobs for the a-m-p seems to pass cleanly since a little while ago. So - in trying to track down this error of yours: 1. What was your maven spec (run mvn --version) where the errors occurred? 2. Have you had any problems in running the a-m-p version 1.7 in a maven POM for one of your projects? My Maven spec on Linux was: Apache Maven 3.1.1 (0728685237757ffbf44136acec0402957f723d9a; 2013-09-17 17:22:22+0200) Maven home: /usr/local/share/maven Java version: 1.7.0_51, vendor: Oracle Corporation Java home: /usr/local/share/jdk1.7.0_51/jre Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 OS name: "linux", version: "3.2.0-68-generic", arch: "amd64", family: "unix" My Maven spec on Mac OS X was: Apache Maven 3.2.1 (ea8b2b07643dbb1b84b6d16e1f08391b666bc1e9; 2014-02-14T18:37:52+01:00) Maven home: /usr/local/share/maven Java version: 1.7.0_65, vendor: Oracle Corporation Java home: /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_65.jdk/Contents/Home/jre Default locale: sv_SE, platform encoding: UTF-8 OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.9.4", arch: "x86_64", family: "mac" 2014-09-10 17:08 GMT+02:00 Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com>: > > - test/build from tag using one of internal project uses aspectj > > - build from tag on windows to validate windows IT > > - build from source tar ball fails on windows + linux > > ------------------------------------------------------- > T E S T S > ------------------------------------------------------- > Running org.codehaus.mojo.aspectj.AbstractAjcCompilerTest > Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.458 sec > - in org.codehaus.mojo.aspectj.AbstractAjcCompilerTest > Running org.codehaus.mojo.aspectj.AjcCompilerMojoTest > Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.237 sec > <<< FAILURE! - in org.codehaus.mojo.aspectj.AjcCompilerMojoTest > testModificationSet(org.codehaus.mojo.aspectj.AjcCompilerMojoTest) Time > elapsed: 0.237 sec <<< FAILURE! > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: A build has compleeted. No > modifications done. no new build needed > at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:57) > at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:22) > at junit.framework.Assert.assertFalse(Assert.java:39) > at junit.framework.TestCase.assertFalse(TestCase.java:210) > at > org.codehaus.mojo.aspectj.AjcCompilerMojoTest.testModificationSet(AjcCompilerMojoTest.java:83) > > Running org.codehaus.mojo.aspectj.AjcHelperTest > Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0 sec - in > org.codehaus.mojo.aspectj.AjcHelperTest > > Results : > > Failed tests: > AjcCompilerMojoTest.testModificationSet:83 A build has compleeted. No > modifications done. no new build needed > > Tests run: 15, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 > > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Baptiste Mathus <bmat...@batmat.net> > wrote: > >> No need to respin since the release has not been found flawed in itself. >> I was just reacting for the general case of why that information is indeed >> needed. >> Cheers and thanks a lot for the work on that release. >> >> 2014-09-10 14:24 GMT+02:00 Lennart Jörelid <lennart.jore...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Bon Jour, Baptiste. >>> >>> I simply missed pasting the explicit (version-specfic) link to the >>> staging repository of the a-m-p version 1.7 into the vote email, >>> but I agree with you that it should be done in general. >>> >>> Do we feel it is OK to proceed with the release vote, since the specific >>> repository link is included in this conversation? >>> Or would we prefer that I respin the vote? >>> >>> >>> 2014-09-10 14:14 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Mathus <bapti...@codehaus.org>: >>> >>>> I don't think this is sufficient in general, because one may want to >>>> check if nothing else than the plugin artifact itself chimed into the >>>> staging repo, and then would be synced to Central when voted one. I was not >>>> there at the time, but I suppose that's one of the reason the template has >>>> the specific staging repo link. >>>> >>>> 2014-09-10 12:57 GMT+02:00 Lennart Jörelid <lennart.jore...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> WRT the staging repository, simply use the "general" link, or the >>>>> "specific" below: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/staging/org/codehaus/mojo/aspectj-maven-plugin/1.7/ >>>>> >>>>> 2014-09-10 12:54 GMT+02:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de>: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>> We solved 7 issues: >>>>>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? >>>>>>> projectId=11781&version=19839 >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Jira looks good now... >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Staging Repositories: >>>>>>> General: https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/staging/ >>>>>>> Exclusive: >>>>>>> https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/SOME_ >>>>>>> SPECIFIC_STAGING_VERSION >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> This is missing...no staging repository given...nor can i find any >>>>>> which looks related to the release you are trying get out... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> (Staging) Site: >>>>>>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/aspectj-maven-plugin/ >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Site looks good ..1.7... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Kind regards >>>>>> Karl-Heinz Marbaise >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> +==============================+ >>>>> | Bästa hälsningar, >>>>> | [sw. "Best regards"] >>>>> | >>>>> | Lennart Jörelid >>>>> | EAI Architect & Integrator >>>>> | >>>>> | jGuru Europe AB >>>>> | Mölnlycke - Kista >>>>> | >>>>> | Email: l...@jguru.se >>>>> | URL: www.jguru.se >>>>> >>>>> | Phone >>>>> | (skype): jgurueurope >>>>> | (intl): +46 708 507 603 >>>>> | (domestic): 0708 - 507 603 >>>>> +==============================+nbsp;! >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> -- >>> +==============================+ >>> | Bästa hälsningar, >>> | [sw. "Best regards"] >>> | >>> | Lennart Jörelid >>> | EAI Architect & Integrator >>> | >>> | jGuru Europe AB >>> | Mölnlycke - Kista >>> | >>> | Email: l...@jguru.se >>> | URL: www.jguru.se >>> | Phone >>> | (skype): jgurueurope >>> | (intl): +46 708 507 603 >>> | (domestic): 0708 - 507 603 >>> +==============================+ >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net >> Sauvez un arbre, >> Mangez un castor ! >> > > -- -- +==============================+ | Bästa hälsningar, | [sw. "Best regards"] | | Lennart Jörelid | EAI Architect & Integrator | | jGuru Europe AB | Mölnlycke - Kista | | Email: l...@jguru.se | URL: www.jguru.se | Phone | (skype): jgurueurope | (intl): +46 708 507 603 | (domestic): 0708 - 507 603 +==============================+
