Apache, and Apache Maven, should just purchase the codehaus.org domain
name and set a permanent redirect to Apache Maven site.

Maybe Ben would be willing to give that last gift to the community and
transfer ownership to Apache. It expires on 2016-02-26 anyway..

On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net> wrote:
> Anyone who knows if it actually possible for us to keep the groupId when
> moving, as we don't own the codehaus.org domain? I think that most of us can
> agree on it's best (at least in short term) and easier to keep the same
> groupId. But can we really do that?
>
> /Anders
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Arnaud Héritier <aherit...@codehaus.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> +1 keep codehaus.org for existing plugins
>> perhaps prepare a new groupId with required resources (central sync ..)
>> for new plugins and add it in the default list of plugins groups for future
>> maven releases
>>
>> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Agree. We must take take it easy for users.
>>> Folks who managed central knows the situation. So IMHO this will not be a
>>> big problem.
>>>
>>> On 4 May 2015 at 20:27, Trygve Laugstøl <tryg...@codehaus.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I think it is best to just keep the group id for all existing Mojos.
>>>> Repackaging the code and having all clients is a lot of hassle for no gain.
>>>> For new plugins, I guess they could use the new group id.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Trygve
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 09:48:59AM +0000, Julien HENRY wrote:
>>>> > Hi guys,
>>>> > Sorry if it was already discussed but do you know what will be the
>>>> > future of the groupId? Now that all plugins are moving to GitHub are we
>>>> > still allowed to deploy on central with groupId org.codehaus.mojo? AFAIK
>>>> > Maven conventions are that we should own the domain codehaus.org to 
>>>> > deploy
>>>> > artifacts with groupId org.codehaus.*
>>>> > And if the plan is to change the groupId, this is a big change since
>>>> > org.codehaus.mojo is hardcoded into Maven as a "default" groupId. It 
>>>> > means
>>>> > for example that SonarQube users simply have to run mvn sonar:sonar 
>>>> > without
>>>> > any special configuration. So I need to know what are the plan in order 
>>>> > to
>>>> > prepare transition (may need to update documentation, Jenkins plugin, 
>>>> > ...).
>>>> > Thanks
>>>> > Julien
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>>
>>>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Olivier Lamy
>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to