some statistics:
user: 645 subscribers
dev: 334 subscribers
announce: 92 subscribers
scm: 63 subscribers
So the user ML is by far the largest. However, its topics often concern a
specific plugin. It would be nice if Github had some sort of space to ask
per-(sub)project questions.
Even though I still like the announcement idea, numbers reflect that it's
not used very much.
So I agree with the suggestions below.
Robert
Op Mon, 04 May 2015 20:52:48 +0200 schreef Baptiste Mathus
<bmat...@batmat.net>:
OK, so, to try and sum up the discussions and reading the ML we currently
have under http://mojo.codehaus.org/mail-lists.html, I think the current
agreement is as follows:
- Development List : already moved to
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/mojohaus-dev
- Commits List : let it die. We'll see in the future if we want one
list
with the commits. May be useful to keep a log of the commits for
reference.
Doesn't seem to be necessary in the short term though. There're more
pressing concerns currently.
- User List : let it die, and inform users to use
us...@maven.apache.org.
That's actually already what happens most of the time anyway.
- Announcements List : same as user list. I don't see us keeping it;
WDYT? Do you agree?
2015-05-04 20:38 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte <codeh...@sourcegrounds.com>:
If the google group is fully up and running, then I don't see any reason
for voting.
You could do a (pre-)announcement saying this ML will be unavailable
soon
and still interested subscribers should move to google groups.
Looking at Xircles, I don't see an option to really close a mailing
list,
although I have the karma to remove everybody one by one. I don't think
it's worth doing so, so I suggest to just bleed those lists to death and
make all subscribers aware of the shift.
Robert
Op Mon, 04 May 2015 20:25:34 +0200 schreef Baptiste Mathus <
bmat...@batmat.net>:
Yes. My point was more indeed more to make people aware that this is
NOW.
About the ML, we already have a new one created on google groups. I
could
have started a vote, granted, but as the discussion didn't give much
feedback nor candidates (ggroups and freelists by Alexandre), so I went
for
the shortcut option. Would you prefer to have a vote for that and
reconsider where we go for the MLs?
2015-05-04 19:41 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte <codeh...@sourcegrounds.com>:
Hi,
I don't think we have a real choice here. Once the Codehaus domain is
gone
including its infra then there are no mailinglists anymore.
The vote should be about the move to X and how to register it for
Markmail
and Nabble.
Robert
Op Mon, 04 May 2015 15:36:52 +0200 schreef Baptiste Mathus <
bmat...@batmat.net>:
Hi,
So, as a followup with the upcoming Codehaus shutdown, to go forward
and
try to attract attention to those who may have missed the other quite
verbose threads .
Let's
Vote open for 72h max (don't know if we could/should wait less), will
NOT
succeed by lazy consensus.
[ ] +1 : deprecate/disable the Mojo@Codehaus related mailing lists
[ ] 0 : meh
[ ] -1 : don't do it 'cause
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
