As long as you can be explicit about what's in the release I think you're good.
Patrick On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Brock Noland <br...@cloudera.com> wrote: > I don't see anything in the release FAQ > (http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html) about releasing two different > tags at the same time. As such I assume when releasing we could > include two tags as part of a single release. > > Brock > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Dave Beech <d...@paraliatech.com> wrote: >> I've almost suggested the same thing while looking at a couple of the >> issues Patrick has raised. Too much has changed / is still changing between >> the hadoop 1 and 2 APIs. It's pretty much impossible already to cater to >> both and I don't see the situation improving. We already produce 2 >> artifacts, so we might as well produce them from different branches. The >> end result for the user will be no different. >> >> Big +1 from me. >> >> Cheers >> Dave >> >> >> On 21 December 2012 19:40, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <jar...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> We had recently similar incompatibility fight in Sqoop, so I can >>> understand your frustration. >>> >>> I'm +1 on the proposal. >>> >>> Jarcec >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 01:29:19PM -0600, Brock Noland wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > In MRUNIT-31 we used mockito to allow a single branch of code work >>> > with hadoop 1 and hadoop 2. Patrick Hunt has filed a number of tickets >>> > for items which don't work with hadoop 2. I do not see an easy way to >>> > fix MRUNIT-167 and MRUNIT-161 in a single branch since hadoop 1 is >>> > lacking a large number of methods that hadoop 2 supports. >>> > >>> > As such, I think that we should think about the following: >>> > >>> > 1) Create hadoop-1 to support hadoop 1 with trunk supporting hadoop 2. >>> > 2) Resolve MRUNIT-167 and MRUNIT-161 in trunk. >>> > 3) Going forward we will have to backport from trunk to the hadoop-1 >>> > branch. At first this will be simple since they are so similar. Over >>> > time this will become more difficult. Hopefully by the time it's too >>> > difficult to support hadoop-1 most people will have already moved to >>> > hadoop 2. >>> > 4) During releases we'll have to generate artifacts from both branches. >>> > >>> > Thoughts? >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - >>> http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/ >>> > > > > -- > Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/
