Hi, A few more people signed the ICLA and we are missing just the following 7 (out of 70) contributors, accounting for 14 (out of 913) commits.
3 @DrustZ 2 @zhangchen-qinyinghua 2 @reyoung 1 @xingmingjie 1 @qiaohaijun 1 @kaleidoscopical 1 @jason-xuan 1 @happynear 1 @antoine-wdg-rmz 1 @alextnewman Is this OK for proceeding with IP clearance? Best, Sheng On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:03 PM Justin Mclean <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > Here's the second update. At the moment we are only missing ICLAs from > 20 (out of 70) contributors, accounting for 31 (out of 913) commits left. > > IMO That's still a significant number of commits and people. > > > Regarding whether the contributors are employed by a company that > requires CCLA for contribution, I have no way of verifying the > contributors' employment status at the time of contribution, and not enough > bandwidth to verify the individual company policies on such contribution. > As such, I will solely rely on the ICLAs. > > The risk is that the IPMC may require more than that, I can’t predict how > other IPMC members will vote in this case. Intel have supplied CCLAs in the > past and there are people on that list not covered by a CCLA could be a > concern along with the missing ICLAs. > > Thanks, > Justin
