+1 (binding) build from source with latest rc0 tag for Mac. I am able to build the whole Scala package and passed all tests.
Thanks, Qing ________________________________ From: Manu Seth <manuseth1...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2020 23:55 To: dev@mxnet.apache.org <dev@mxnet.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.8.0.rc0 +1 Was able to build from source following instructions on [1] and then comments in config_gpu.cmake file. I agree with Aaron that the instructions should all be in one place. Users should not have to go inside cmake config files and follow comments there. I built MXNet on an Ubuntu 18.04 Deep Learning Base AMI, with CUDA v11.0 and cuDNN v8.0.2, and tested it by running all non operator tests in tests/python/gpu/ folder. [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/1.8.0.rc0/docs/static_site/src/pages/get_started/build_from_source.md#building-mxnet Manu On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 6:30 PM Aaron Markham <aaron.s.mark...@gmail.com> wrote: > Couple of issues with instructions: > 1) Downloaded the tar.gz for the release and looked at the build from > source directions on the website, but these have you use cmake and don't > really tell you what to do... just look at the cmake config files. I mean > sure, I guess I can look inside a config file's comments for build > instructions. But these don't even work. (Could be related to #2, but IDK > since I haven't really tried using the cmake route as it used to be > incompatible with the docs/website builds.) > 2) Tried just doing a make. This fails because none of the submodules are > there. So where are the instructions for how to use an official > distribution release now that so much stuff has been removed? > > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:36 AM Skalicky, Sam <sska...@amazon.com.invalid > > > wrote: > > > Thanks for pointing this out Leonard. Has anyone been able to reproduce > > the problem on 1.8.0.rc0? > > > > Either way, I would proposed that we continue validating the release > as-is > > and see if we can find any other issues. > > > > Sam > > > > On 9/28/20, 10:22 AM, "Leonard Lausen" <lau...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do > > not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and > > know the content is safe. > > > > > > > > Thank you Sam for driving the 1.8 release! > > > > As the included oneDNN package is known to produce nan results on the > > master > > branch [1] and is pending an upstream fix by Intel, I'd suggest to > > extend the > > vote until we have clarity if the bug also affects the 1.8 release, > > given that > > oneDNN is enabled in the default configuration [2]. > > > > [1]: > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/19185#issuecomment-698274033 > > [2]: > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1a22dbd79098adab6d02d16e8d607bae2acc908c0bb1b085d28a51ba@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E > > > > On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 18:28 -0700, sandeep krishnamurthy wrote: > > > Sam, > > > > > > Thank you for driving the v1.8.0 release of MXNet. This is exciting > > given > > > it is coming with CUDA11 and cuDNN8!! > > > > > > Fixing the release candidate link: > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.8.0.rc0 > > > > > > Best, > > > Sandeep > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:24 PM Skalicky, Sam > > <sska...@amazon.com.invalid> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Dear MXNet community, > > > > > > > > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version > > 1.8.0. > > > > Voting will start September 26, 23:59:59 PDT and close on > > September 29, > > > > 23:59:59 PDT. > > > > > > > > Link to release notes: > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.8.0+Release+Notes > > > > > > > > Link to release candidate: > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.7.0.rc0 > > > > > > > > Link to source and signatures on apache dist server: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.8.0.rc0/ > > > > > > > > Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly: > > > > +1 = approve > > > > +0 = no opinion > > > > -1 = disapprove (provide reason) > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Sam Skalicky > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sandeep Krishnamurthy > > > > > > >
