Reverted to "Copyright Contributors"? On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 18:15 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ok, so here's my +1 to release, with the following notes: > > - The NOTICE file is wrong. Unless the dependencies listed have explicit > notice requirements (they don't seem to) nothing needs to be added to the > NOTICE file. > - The source headers should be reverted in any areas where not all > contributors to that file have signed ICLAs, otherwise we need some kind of > agreement they are OK with moving to NOTICE file (which is how this has > been handled in the past). > > Please create JIRAs to track these. > > John > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:09 PM Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I believe all the major contributors were ICLA'd, and I disagree that all > > contributors need to SGA/ICLA; we don't do that for an existing project. > > > > We need to do the check to see how the footprint of contributions for the > > largest contributor without an ICLA is (apologies for the horrible > wording > > there). There are over 400 contributors, but (quickly eyeballing) most > are > > covered by ICLA or small contributions. Note that we also have clause 5 > of > > Apache 2.0 at play for historical contributions here. > > > > To John's point on source headers; the previous source headers said > > "Copyright <year> by Contributors". > > > > Hen > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:01 Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Hi Henri, > > > > > > If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who contributed > > to > > > the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as > part > > of > > > IP Clearance. > > > > > > It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0. > > > > > > Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the > incubator > > > who are not now committers? > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > > On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling > release. > > > Will > > > > review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar. > > > > > > > > There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). Code > > has > > > > been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Dominic, > > > >> > > > >> One question, from looking a second time. Was MXNet always Apache > > > Licensed > > > >> (prior to coming to the ASF)? > > > >> > > > >> John > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni < > > > >> dominic.divakar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far. > > > >>> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and > > vote? > > > >>> > > > >>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this > > project? > > > >>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit. > > > >>> > > > >>> Dom > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament < > > johndam...@apache.org> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Non pmc members can vote non-binding. Usually mentors review > > > releases. > > > >>>> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it? Due to there > > being > > > >> no > > > >>>> SGA its a harder release to review. I also need to cross check > > ICLAs > > > >> and > > > >>>> files that have changed license. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" < > > > >>>> dominic.divakar...@gmail.com> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the > > > >>>> committers > > > >>>>> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in > on > > > >> this > > > >>>>> release? > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal < > > > >>>> meghnabaijal2...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> Hi All, > > > >>>>>> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating) > > > >> 0.11.0 > > > >>>> is > > > >>>>>> still open. > > > >>>>>> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0 > > > >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion > > > >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because… > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Thanks, > > > >>>>>> Meghna > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal < > > > >>>> meghnabaijal2...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Hi all > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) > 0.11.0, > > > >>>>> release > > > >>>>>>> candidate 3. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Vote thread: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea > > > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E < > > > >>>>>> > > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea > > > >>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Result thread: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13 > > > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E < > > > >>>>>> > > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13 > > > >>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be > > > >>> found > > > >>>>> at: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ > > > >>> < > > > >>>>>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ > > > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> The release tag can be found here: > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 < > > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd > and > > > >>> can > > > >>>>> be > > > >>>>>> found here: > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/ > > > >>>>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd < > > > >> https://github.com/apache/ > > > >>>>>> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > > > >>>>>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549 > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> KEY files are available here: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ > > > >>> < > > > >>>>>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ > > > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> For information about the contents of this release, see: > > > >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0. > > > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate < > > > >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0. > > > >>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0 > > > >>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion > > > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> -- > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Dominic Divakaruni > > > >>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Dominic Divakaruni > > > >>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > Craig L Russell > > > Secretary, Apache Software Foundation > > > c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo > > > > > > > > >
