It's using a fixed binary version of openblas and opencv, so the versions there might be different than what we use. It's compiling with profiler enabled. A few build flags. However all it's doing is building, it doesn't test.
The best lines to compare would be this: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/master/Jenkinsfile#L236 to this: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/ApacheSoftwareFoundation/incubator-mxnet/build/1.0.4047#L96 to get an idea of the (minor) differences. On Dec 8, 2017 12:51 AM, "Chris Olivier" <[email protected]> wrote: Does Appveyor do anything that Jenkins isn't doing? Anything at all? On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 3:41 PM, kellen sunderland < [email protected]> wrote: > @Chris nope, AppVeyor has only ever supported Windows. > > I think some people are thinking of Travis CI, which is a pretty great > managed CI that does support MacOS/Linux. I'd be in favour of setting up a > Mac build there. At a minimum we can at least start a new compiling task > with clang in the new CI. > > On Dec 7, 2017 11:41 PM, "Indhu" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > My build is waiting in queue for 13 hours now. > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017, 11:26 AM kellen sunderland < > > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Background: Appveyor is a free-to-use (for opensource) CI system that > > > specializes in providing support for Windows environments. Appveyor is > > > currently running a very simple windows build for MXNet. Specifically > we > > > are generating build files via cmake, and then building with Visual > > Studio > > > 14 with fairly standard build options. > > > > > > Problem: AppVeyor frequently slows down our release process and has > been > > > made redundant by the new CI system's windows builds. > > > > > > Action: Let's remove AppVeyor and rely on the new CI's windows build > > > systems which has very similar functionality. > > > > > > Vote will close Monday Dec 11th and will rely on lazy consensus. > > > > > > -Kellen > > > > > >
