Agreed with Chris and Jeff. Googling for MXNet roadmap is enlightening. Also the communication channels are disperse. I would remove suggesting "Ask questions" in issues in the README.md because this encourages inflation of issues that are just questions.
We should link to the slack channel or discuss or mailing list in the README and be clear on how to use those communication channels. More visibility on epics / roadmap in something like Trello? Roadmap tagged issues right not don't seem to be really maintained. Explicitly asking in a TODO file or in the README or the Wiki on how other people can contribute. Having a list of "low hanging fruit" issues for newcomers to pick and get familiar contributing to the project. Making a blog post about how to contribute to MXNet, can be as simple as how to use CLion to contribute to the project and send a patch... Just my thoughts. Pedro. On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 9:55 PM, Chris Olivier <[email protected]> wrote: > I suggest more transparency in the development process and requirement > definitions and grooming. > > Backlog wish-list on public wiki, which link to public JIRA epics or > stories, where people outside of Amazon can edit/comment on the items or > add items themselves. > > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Bhavin Thaker <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> Do you have any suggestions on how to increase community involvement and >> contributions including code additions/changes, bug-fixes/enhancements, >> documentation updates, tutorials, increased adoption, answering questions >> on Stackoverflow/discuss.mxnet.io, etc.? >> >> While I have asked multiple questions in the one question above, I am >> looking for more ideas or thoughts. >> >> Cheers, >> Bhavin Thaker. >>
