Hi Pedro, Actually my team had the exact same requirement and we now have an internal MXNet package with all the necessary header files. Note that if you have some custom operators and plan to write an extension library for them, you are going to need to copy not only the public header files but also the private ones under the src directory. Unfortunately the separation of public and private types are not well-defined and there is definitely some room for improvement. Just let me know if you need any feedback.
By the way I am working on writing a CMake Find-module for MXNet. In case you are interested I can keep you posted. -Can On Wed, Feb 14, 2018, at 19:03, Anirudh wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > Canonical added snap package for MXNet last year: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/4852 > Would be good to verify if it works for your use case. > > Anirudh > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Marco de Abreu < > marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > Sounds like a great idea! Please also consider the issues labelled as Cpp > > package on GitHub. > > > > -Marco > > > > Am 14.02.2018 6:48 nachm. schrieb "Pedro Larroy" < > > pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Hi > > > > > > We would like to use MXNet from C++ without Python. Currently the cpp > > > package depends on additional MXNet headers, nnvm and dmlc. > > > > > > As far as I know we don't have a standalone package of MXNet with > > > library + headers. > > > > > > I would like to create a deb package of MXNet for example which has > > > the library and headers so standalone C++ applications linked against > > > MXNet can be created. > > > > > > Is anybody else working on this? Any additional feedback / gotchas > > > that I should be aware of? > > > > > > Pedro. > > > > >